There has been a drive by some college football and basketball coaches to create a salary for players in addition to the scholarship they receive.
The theory is that college programs make a lot of money for the schools, and the athletes should get some of it.
One athletic director who is 100 percent opposed to the idea of paying college athletes is the Gophers' Joel Maturi.
"I think we pay for it by giving tuition, fees, room, board and books, which has a tremendous value," Maturi said. "I think it's far more complicated than that. I don't know where the money would come from, I don't know how you would determine who gets what money, is it just revenue-driven sports?
"Is it just people that play in the games or do you include the reserves as well? It's a complicated issue. I think that if the kids leave the university with their degree, they are leaving with something that's going to impact them for the rest of their lives. If they don't leave here with their degree, then it's not good for us and it's not good for them. But I'm against paying."
Maturi said the University of Minnesota does provide money to student-athletes based on need, an amount that can account for as much as $4,000 to $5,000, and they don't have to repay it.
Maturi said what has happened is that college athletics has become a big business in the sports of football and men's basketball.
"There's a lot of money there and we, as an institution, are making significant dollars because of the efforts of these young people, and as a result there's a belief that, you know what, they're helping us make it, therefore they should receive some of the funds that are being made," Maturi said.