Should people with autism and very high needs have a separate diagnosis? Takeaways from AP's report

As the definition of autism has widened, there's been a growing push to create a new diagnosis, called profound autism, for those who need constant and lifelong care.

The reason? To ensure that they get the support and services they need.

Judith Ursitti, president of the Profound Autism Alliance, said people in this category now lack appropriate treatments, support and enough providers trained to handle their level of care. And the vast majority of clinical research doesn't include them.

''If you don't have research, you won't have treatments. You won't have achievable services and supports,'' said Ursitti, whose adult son has profound autism. ''There are people across the spectrum who have high support needs that are intermittent. The difference with our population is they're constant.''

Autism rates have been rising for decades, and two of the main reasons for the increase have, in a strange twist, taken some of the focus off of helping people with round-the-clock needs. The diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is now very broad, including many people with low support needs. Also, better awareness of the condition has helped many more children get diagnosed than in the past — and most of those cases are relatively mild.

At the same time, the Trump Administration is promoting unproven and debunked claims about what causes autism, which experts say muddles efforts to understand the condition and fuels misinformation that threatens public health, even as officials funnel more money into research.

Overall in the U.S., an estimated 1 in 31 children has autism spectrum disorder.

In the past, these people may have been diagnosed with autistic disorder – one of five subtypes, along with Asperger's, of a diagnosis called pervasive developmental disorders. But in 2013, the American Psychiatric Association removed that diagnosis and created autism spectrum disorder.

Some in the autism community worry that creating a separate diagnosis of profound autism would reduce attention on the broader spectrum and the individual needs of everyone on it.

Dena Gassner, an autistic senior research scientist at Drexel University and mother of an autistic adult with moderate support needs, said she struggles with the idea of assigning someone the label of profound autism. She said it could be stigmatizing.

She said there's nothing wrong with being autistic; the problem lies in ''the massive lack of supports and services'' in our society. ''We need to come together in a unified voice to talk about services for the entirety of the spectrum.''

Andy Shih, chief science officer for Autism Speaks, said no matter where people fall on the debate about profound autism, ''there's absolutely no doubt that we need to elevate awareness about the needs of this group.''