Veterans went to the microphone Friday to call for change in culture of the massive Veterans Affairs bureaucracy and to demand accountability from top local leaders who recently were accused of seeking retribution against employees who complained of secret scheduling lists and canceled appointments.
Close to 100 vets attended the town hall meeting in Minneapolis, part of a nationwide effort by the VA to repair an image tarnished by revelations that vets were forced to wait long periods for appointments and that some workers were asked to keep separate books on how long it was taking for patients to be seen.
Local VA officials extolled the accomplishments of the Minneapolis VA, which had enjoyed a stellar reputation among the nation's VA hospitals. The local VA has made more than 600 specialty care appointments since April, addressing a concern about a backlog. It will spend $100 million this year on non-VA care for vets who need it.
But they also acknowledged that mistakes could have been made and have to be addressed.
This week, the VA's inspector general was in town to investigate claims by two former workers that the Minneapolis VA ordered them to falsify records in the hospital's gastroenterology department. The former workers also claim they were fired in retribution.
The Minneapolis VA system also has been flagged in a national audit for potential problems with how wait times were calculated, both at the Minneapolis hospital and at an outpatient clinic in Rochester.
"I fully commit for us to investigate those allegations, to call on the appropriate oversight bodies to help us understand where we may have made mistakes if that's the case, and to correct those mistakes," said Janet Murphy, network director for the VA's Midwest Health Care Network, which includes the Minneapolis hospital. "We probably have some work to do to regain the trust and confidence of veterans and our stakeholders."
Several vets focused on the recent allegations. Jason Quick, Minnesota state director for Concerned Veterans for America, asked why the local whistleblowers were fired while higher-level VA officials are permitted to take administrative leave when accused of wrongdoing.