Reviewed in brief: "Pink Ribbons, Inc."

Does the anti-cancer campaign obscure the reality?

July 5, 2012 at 7:20PM
"PInk Robbons, Inc."
"PInk Robbons, Inc." (National Film Board of Canada/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

PINK RIBBONS, INC.

★★★ out of four stars

UnratedWhere: Lagoon.

How can anyone say anything negative about breast cancer awareness? And why should pink ribbons, a symbol of hope and sisterhood, make some women feel angry and alienated?

"Pink Ribbons, Inc.," a documentary by Lea Pool, addresses both questions with the orneriness and attention to detail of a committed gadfly.

All we need do, the film contends, is look at the many corporate tentacles entwined in the cross-marketed ribbon campaign to see a money-making entity as brazen and far-reaching as it is pink. The film asks where, exactly, the money goes. It concludes that no one is really paying much attention: The money raised goes toward pharmaceutical research, mainly, but there's a great deal of overlap and repetition. Not much goes toward understanding prevention and causes. "Pink Ribbons, Inc." is most damning, and most effective, when it follows the money and suggests hypocrisy in some of these corporate tie-ins: It ticks off the carcinogens in dairy products, beauty products, cars.

Author Barbara Ehrenreich criticizes efforts to make cancer "pretty and feminine and normal," and activist Barbara Brenner extols the virtues of anger in working for change. Executives from the Komen Foundation, Avon and corporate-philanthropic giants make the case for the other side.

Scattered among the interviews, historical overviews and perky graphics are deeply moving comments from women with stage 4 breast cancer. They object to the cuteness of the worldwide ribbon campaigns. And they object, they say, to being branded with a logo. "We're human beings," as one of them says. "We're not just a little pink ribbon."

about the writer

about the writer

AMY BIANCOLLI, Houston Chronicle

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
In this photo taken Monday, March 6, 2017, in San Francisco, released confidential files by The University of California of a sexual misconduct case, like this one against UC Santa Cruz Latin Studies professor Hector Perla is shown. Perla was accused of raping a student during a wine-tasting outing in June 2015. Some of the files are so heavily redacted that on many pages no words are visible. Perla is one of 113 UC employees found to have violated the system's sexual misconduct policies in rece
Associated Press/The Minnesota Star Tribune

We respect the desire of some tipsters to remain anonymous, and have put in place ways to contact reporters and editors to ensure the communication will be private and secure.