Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons



I wrote a piece which appeared both here and on the Brainstorm blog at the Chronicle of Higher Education that apparently caught the attention of someone in the university administration.  For background, please see: Why Would An Academic Health Center Support Homeopathy?


Drs. Frank Cerra and Aaron Friedman sent a response that I posted on the Chronicle site as well as below.  Please note that it does not even mention my original post topic  which was homeopathy.  I've put in some brief comments on some of the more egregious statments. 


Response: Why Would an Academic Health Center Support Homeopathy?

Guest Post:
Dr. Frank Cerra, former Vice President, University of Minnesota Academic Health Center and Medical School Dean
Dr. Aaron Friedman, Vice President, University of Minesota Academic Health Center and Medical School Dean
In a February 4, 2011 blog post-turned-editorial, University of Minnesota associate professor Bill Gleason openly questions why a University with an evidence-based medical school would dedicate resources to a Center for Spirituality & Healing (CSH).

The post was about homeopathy, gentlemen...

We thought that was an excellent question, so are pleased to have an opportunity to respond.
The Center for Spirituality & Healing was established in 1995 during a period of time when medicine and the health professions in general were coming to terms with the idea that what we don’t know about improving human health is far greater than what we do know within the confines of our traditional, Western-based practice. The original concept was to develop a program that provided faculty, students, and the community with an entry point to what’s now called integrative medicine, or integrative health care.
Since its inception in 1995, the Center for Spirituality & Healing has helped push health care forward.  Students have been and continue to be one of the major drivers for the growth of CSH by crossing disciplines to expand their field of study and adding integrative medicine insight to their scope of study. The Center’s growing number of faculty educates health professionals on new models of care and positions consumers at the center of their health care. Most importantly, the Center helps patients more effectively navigate the health care system, a benefit to any health provider.


Including helpful suggestions on the AHC website about homeopathy and advice about how to select a practioner + employment by the CSH of homeopathy practitioners?


The field of health care is undergoing profound change.  Today, patients more frequently combine a complementary treatment approach to traditional therapies. They’re also taking a more active role in the health care decisions that impact them and to do so, are seeking care from providers who are able to safely and effectively integrate these two types of therapies. Such a shift is an asset – not a threat – as we look to treat the entire patient.
The operating principle of the CSH is to have an evidence-based approach to complementary approaches to health, and also to promote comparative, evidence-based research between complementary and traditional therapies—knowledge that providers need to best serve the patients coming to them for integrative care. So in charging the University with wasting its resources in supporting the CSH, Gleason couldn’t be further from the truth.


Absolutely false, gentlemen. The post was about the CSH wasting its resources on homeopathy.  A fact that all the circumlocution in the world cannot obscure.


In actuality, only a small percentage of the Center’s funding comes from University resources. The rest, it earns through tuition revenue, philanthropic gifts, and extensive research funding.  Integrative medicine is an internationally recognized area of study, including by the National Institutes of Health, and our CSH has been very successful in competing for NIH funding.


And what does the NIH say about homeopathy, gentlemen. From my first post:  In a 2010 report, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a division of the National Institutes of Health, said that the key concepts of homeopathy "are not consistent with the established laws of science."


For all of these reasons, the CSH is a great investment with incredible returns. In fact, for every University dollar invested in the CSH, it leverages such funding to generate ten more dollars. If all University Centers, Institutes, and faculty functioned as efficiently or as productively as the CSH, our University would be on very solid footing indeed.

 Wow, the (dubious) claim that since we can "make money" on CSH, this somehow justifies the practice of homeopathy.  I thought universities were supposed to be pursuing truth.  If astrology could bring in the bucks, that would be OK?  Alchemy?  Faith Healing?

The University of Minnesota’s Center for Spirituality & Healing was founded on the assumption that Western medicine may not have all the answers.  In 2011, what we don’t know about improving human health still exceeds that which we do know.  Perhaps this will always be the case.




But either way, it would be the height of arrogance to think that one line of thinking could possibly supply every brush stroke needed to complete the overall scene.


And who said this?  You are tap dancing around the "H" word, gentlemen.


In its short 15 year tenure, the CSH has established a model curriculum, hired faculty, and developed a graduate minor as well as a post-baccalaureate certificate program. And for 15 years, the Center for Spirituality & Healing has enriched health and well-being by providing high-quality interdisciplinary education, conducting rigorous research, and delivering innovative programs that advance integrative health and healing.
We look forward to discovering what the next 15 years holds for not just our Center, but the field of integrative medicine as a whole.
It’s critical to remember that our University is a state-wide resource and its mission is to serve the whole patient, the whole state, and the nation.

This is a pathetic response from the present and former deans of the University of Minnesota medical school.  Presumably they have taken chemistry courses at some point and are both aware of Avogadro's number.  There is no medicine in homeopathic medicine, gentlemen. 
This is a pitiful and evasive answer to my original question: Why would an Academic Health Center support homeopathy?

Older Post

Why Would an Academic Health Center Support Homeopathy?

Newer Post

'Ma Rainey' Plays the Guthrie