Minnesota regulators will study shifting some segments of a proposed northern Minnesota crude oil pipeline in the face of public concern about the risk to lakes, wetlands and the Mississippi River headwaters.
But the state Commerce Department, which is overseeing an environmental review of Enbridge Energy's proposed Sandpiper pipeline, on Thursday said it doesn't endorse studying a wholesale reroute of the proposed $2.6 billion project to carry North Dakota crude oil.
State officials recommended studying 53 proposed adjustments to Enbridge's preferred route across northwest Minnesota to Clearbrook, then south to Park Rapids and east to an oil terminal at Superior, Wis. Alternate segments were proposed by residents, state environmental agencies and others to avoid sensitive areas or particular properties.
"Obviously we're dissatisfied with the decision," said Richard Smith, president of Friends of the Headwaters, an environmental group that has proposed shifting the entire Sandpiper's route south of Interstate 94.
Officials at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), who also had recommended a new, southern route to avoid lakes and wetlands, said they were studying the recommendations of the Commerce Department and had no immediate comment.
More than 900 people and institutions have submitted 1,087 comments to state regulators about the proposed pipeline, and most were critical or opposed, according to the Commerce Department's analysis. Just 37 comments expressed "general support" for the project, the analysis found, while 459 expressed general opposition, and hundreds more had concerns about various environmental or other issues.
Lorraine Little, a spokeswoman for Calgary, Alberta-based Enbridge, said the company has been working to select the best route for the line and will continue to work with regulators on alternatives.
"We still believe our preferred Sandpiper route is the best for the project," she said in an interview Thursday. "That route meets the project objectives and still minimizes impacts to people and the environment."