HARRISBURG, Pa. — Philadelphia cannot impose stricter firearms regulations than are allowed by state law, Pennsylvania's Democratic-majority state Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday, a blow to city leaders looking for ways to stem gun violence.
The justices ruled 6-0 to uphold a lower court's dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the city, the nonprofit group CeaseFirePA and family members of gun violence victims.
They had sought to throw out a state law that has long prohibited municipalities from regulating the ownership or possession of guns or ammunition. Under it, courts in Pennsylvania have thrown out decades of local firearms measures, including a 1990s-era assault weapons ban in Pittsburgh.
Justice Kevin Brobson's majority opinion acknowledged the tragedy of gun violence and that ''a serious problem exists.'' But, he wrote, the court's role was not to decide whether laws passed by the Legislature are adequate to address the challenge.
''There is nothing for us to do in the absence of a constitutional violation or other infirmity'' in state firearms laws that preempt local ordinances, Brobson, a Republican, wrote.
Gun-rights proponents hailed the decision. On his website, Joshua Prince, a lawyer who advocates for gun rights in court cases, called it a ''monumental decision.'' The nonprofit organization Pennsylvania Gun Rights called it a ''huge win.''
''For two years, Pennsylvanians have lived with this threat that localities might soon be allowed to create their own gun laws — including outright bans,'' the organization wrote on Facebook. ''Today, that fear is lifted.''
Republicans in the General Assembly, joined by a segment of Democrats, have voted repeatedly in recent years against proposals backed by many urban and suburban lawmakers to restrict gun ownership or gun owners' rights.