The latest promising Alzheimer's disease drug trial is causing a burst of excitement for Biogen Idec Inc. investors. It may be too early to celebrate.
Other Alzheimer's drugs that later failed in larger, more comprehensive effectiveness tests showed the same sort of initial promise as Biogen's, say neurologists. The biotechnology company said yesterday that it would move the drug, BIIB037, into a final-stage trial based on positive Phase 1 data, sending its shares up as much as 9.1 percent when the market opened.
The trial of fewer than 200 patients showed the drug removed a protein fragment that causes plaques in the brain that are a hallmark of Alzheimer's. Patients also did better on cognitive tests, Doug Williams, Biogen's head of research and development, said at a Deutsche Bank conference this week.
That's "good news, but not necessarily good enough news," said Samuel Gandy, director of New York's Mount Sinai Center for Cognitive Health. What counts as statistical success in a trial doesn't always mean a meaningful clinical difference for doctors and patients, he said.
The investor excitement over Biogen's data reflects the desperate need for a successful drug. There have been more than 100 failed attempts to develop a treatment for the neurodegenerative disease since 1998, according to a 2012 report by the trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Only a handful of drugs have been approved to manage symptoms, and none to treat the cause.
Growing disease
Meanwhile, the Alzheimer's population is growing. An estimated 5.2 million Americans have the disease, according to the Alzheimer's Association. By 2025, that number is expected to grow 40 percent as the U.S. population ages. Alzheimer's causes memory loss, dementia, and is the sixth-leading cause of death in the U.S., according to the Alzheimer's Association.
Biogen said it will present full data from the trial early next year, which may clear up questions on how much the drug helped.
To produce a statistically significant cognition benefit in fewer than 200 patients who had only mild symptoms "is surprising" and "suggests the effect size is large," said Eric Schmidt, an analyst at Cowen & Co., in an e-mail.