The Senate passed an $880 million public safety funding bill late Friday that raises pay for judges, directs more money to the public defender system and includes an array of spending on crime investigation and prevention.
Senate Judiciary Chair Ron Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park, described the 200-page bill as spending heavily on the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, law enforcement partnerships and support for victims and first responders. Before the 34-33 party-line vote, Latz thanked his senators for six hours of discussion on the bill.
"Today we're righting the ship. The ship for too long has been lurching in one direction," Latz said, adding that the "tough-on-crime approach" of the GOP was unbalanced.
Republicans who united in opposition countered that the bill is a "Get Out of Jail Free" card for criminals. Sen. Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove, told reporters, "Quite honestly, I've never seen a more dangerous bill presented from the work of the Senate Judiciary."
All of the proposals in the bill have a long way to go. The House will eventually pass a public safety bill that differs from the Senate version. Leaders from both parties will work out their differences in a conference committee and return the adjusted bills to the two chambers for another round of votes.
One big difference involves new gun provisions. The Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed changes, including expanded criminal background checks for pistols and semiautomatic assault-style rifles sold at gun shows and online. Another provision would include a red flag law, creating pathways to get a gun away from a dangerous person — through filing a petition with law enforcement or requesting an emergency hearing with a judge.
The Senate bill included funding for the changes, but left a vote on the underlying policies for another day.
Senate Minority Leader Mark Johnson, R-East Grand Forks, framed a vote for the public safety bill as a vote for new gun restrictions. Johnson said he expects the DFL to "load up" the House bill with gun measures that would be included in a conference committee report and returned to the Senate for an up-or-down vote on the full package, meaning they couldn't be removed.