MINNEAPOLIS — The Minnesota Supreme Court has ordered election officials in the state's most populous county to go back to a list submitted by the state's Republican Party and pick new members for a board that validates absentee ballots.
In an order handed down late Tuesday, the court said officials in Hennepin County — home to Minneapolis and many of its suburbs — had a duty to appoint election judges off the party's list before letting cities pick from it and exhaust the number of people available. The court gave the county until Friday to comply.
Until now the county absentee ballot board had been filled by four Democrats and one Republican.
Minnesota began in-person early voting and absentee balloting on Sept. 20. Tuesday's Supreme Court order, signed by Chief Justice Natalie Hudson, did not invalidate any of the more than 263,000 absentee ballots the county already received. More than 209,000 of those ballots have been accepted by the current review board.
The Republican Party of Minnesota and an allied group, the Minnesota Voters Alliance, petitioned the court to intervene after determining that nobody on the Republican Party list of more than 1,500 volunteers had been appointed to Hennepin County's absentee ballot board. The volunteers were drawn from counties statewide and their names submitted to the Secretary of State's Office earlier this year. The Democratic Party in Minnesota submitted its own list to the office, and election judges are supposed to be selected from both parties' rosters.
The absentee ballot board is made up of five election judges and several deputy county auditors. Hennepin County officials said in a court filing that 40 of the 45 cities across the county appoint their own election judges and have their own absentee ballot boards.
County officials said the localities exhausted the list of available election judges before Hennepin County could fill its own absentee ballot board. The county had over 6,000 election judge positions to fill. They said they used the authority they believed they had under state law to name board members who weren't on the list submitted to the Secretary of State's Office.
Secretary of State Steve Simon argued in a court filing that the county had complied with state law, but the Supreme Court disagreed. It said the county must start with names submitted by the political parties to fill ballot board seats, though its order did not specifically say how many Republicans or how many Democrats should be appointed.