Every time the NHL cracks down on hits to the head or hits from behind, you get the few traditionalists (i.e. Mike Milbury) screaming that they're trying to take hitting out of the game.
Every time a player gets hurt in a fight, you've got one side screaming that fighting needs to be banished from the NHL, you've got the other side saying it's a necessity, both from an intimidation point of view and an entertainment point of view.
There are passionate debates about myriad subjects in the NHL.
But find me one person beating the drum about the virtues of touch icing? Honestly: Is there anybody screaming, "Man, we've got to keep that exciting race for the puck on icings, or the game is unwatchable?"
So why when every other league in the world has no-touch or hybrid icing does the NHL continue to have touch icing?
It'd be nice if somebody had the figures of how many average icings are actually negated in an NHL game and, of those, how many amount to anything resembling a scoring chance or goal.
One out of 20, if that?
Well, those of us who unfortunately went down to Xcel Energy Center the night of Sept. 30 witnessed another horrifying train wreck that left a player writhing in pain on the ice with a shattered femur.