The Minnesota Security Hospital in St. Peter failed to provide prescribed medications for three mentally ill patients, including one patient infected with HIV, in the latest sign of disarray at the state's largest psychiatric institution.
A state investigation released Thursday found that the patients failed to receive their prescribed drugs for short periods in August and September because of a system glitch in which doctors outside the facility were not notified of expired medication orders. The patient with HIV went 10 days without receiving prescribed drugs for his condition, the virus that causes AIDS, investigators found.
The procedural lapse is the latest in a recent string of incidents at the security hospital, which houses 225 of the state's most dangerous and mentally ill patients. Since January, the hospital has been found responsible for neglect in the bloody killing of one patient, who was beaten to death in his room, and for subjecting patients to hours of inappropriate restraint and seclusion.
Facing sharp criticism from patient advocates and lawmakers, the state Department of Human Services has launched an ambitious effort to clean up systemic problems at the St. Peter facility, including inadequate staffing and staff injuries.
The reforms, which have cost more than $10 million, include the hiring of more than 80 staff, the installation of security cameras in all units, and an ambitious training effort centered on getting staff to engage more fully with patients.
While many of the reforms have yet to fully take hold, the hospital has shown significant progress in moving more patients back into the community and in reducing the use of restraints and seclusion.
"I don't think you can find a health system in this state where something doesn't go wrong. It's human beings that work in these systems," Deputy Human Services Commissioner Anne Barry said in an interview. "The important thing is that we found [the error], we reported it, and we did the right thing — we fixed it."
Yet new revelations surface every few months, causing some to question whether the state is capable of operating the facility in a manner that protects patients and staff. Some patient advocates are calling for a more radical shift in strategy, including the possibility of relinquishing day-to-day management to an outside group or team of mental health experts.