The Vikings would be insane not to sign Brett Favre if they believe his right arm will be healthy enough to play this season.
They have room under the salary cap and nobody who's better at quarterback, and Favre wants to be here. And, oh yeah, it wouldn't cost them a draft pick or a player.
Other than ESPN annexing Winter Park, where's the downside?
In 2007, the New York Jets were 4-12 without Favre. In 2008, with a healthy Favre completing 71 percent of his passes through the first 11 games, the Jets doubled their victory total to 8-3 by upsetting the undefeated Titans in Tennessee.
A healthy Favre threw 20 touchdown passes in 11 games and made the Jets a much better team. An ailing Favre threw nine interceptions and caused them them go 1-4 down the stretch.
So it seems like an easy call at Winter Park. If the medical staff believes Favre's torn right biceps is easily repairable or will heal soon, Favre joins the Vikings and they become a better team.
If his arm goes kablooey, the Vikings simply return to Plan A, Sage Rosenfels and/or Tarvaris Jackson. If Favre stinks it up after eight to 10 games, there's no John Madden Rule that says the Vikings can't bench or release him altogether. Plenty of Hall of Famers have been released before. Jerry Rice, the greatest receiver in NFL history, was cut when he couldn't make it as a fourth receiver in Denver.
From a purely football IQ perspective, signing a healthy Favre is a no-brainer. He'd be in a West Coast offense that's similar to what he ran in Green Bay. He also would be paired with a great running game and a solid defense, both of which should lessen Favre's desire to take risks with the football.