By the time Zach Parise and Ryan Suter finish their concurrent 13-year contracts with the Minnesota Wild, we will have witnessed four presidential elections and seven Olympiads, and the Vikings will be hinting they will move to Buenos Aires if the Legislature doesn't fund a new stadium to replace decrepit WilfyWorld.
The NFL will penalize all physical contact, as well as harsh glances, and baseball fans will have learned to speak in source code so they can insult the home-plate robot.
Parise and Suter are going to be around longer than some species. The rational question, following a week of irrational exuberance, is whether that's a good thing.
There is no clear precedent by which to judge two 13-year, $98 million contracts given by a struggling franchise to players who have never won a championship. There are only precedents that hint at the risk of signing even great players to long-term deals.
Before the 1993 season, the Twins signed Kirby Puckett to a five-year, $30 million deal that set a short-lived record as the most lucrative contract in baseball history.
He would make three more All-Star teams before his career ended, prematurely, before the beginning of the 1996 season. The Twins never regretted the contract, as they celebrated Puckett becoming a one-franchise player who entered the Hall of Fame wearing their cap.
During the 1997-98 season, the Timberwolves signed Kevin Garnett to a six-year, $126 million contract.
While the amount seemed outrageous at the time, Garnett made the Wolves a perennial playoff team and took them to one conference final, and his departure, via trade, led to years of abject failure. Garnett was worth the money, even if his contract prevented the team from acquiring other high-priced players.