I could write a column about the Gophers playing pathetically in a must-win, should-win game against a lousy team. Or I could just write: Ibid.
Coach Brew says he's proud of his guys. They played hard. They displayed a "never-say-die" attitude, and "character."
Which raises a few questions, considering Tim Brewster offered that praise after his team suffered the most meaningful loss of his tenure, 35-32 to lowly Illinois on Saturday at The Bank:
• Why does a team that plays so lousy that it has to scramble back from a 21-point deficit against a backup freshman quarterback and the worst defense in the Big Ten get credit for gumption?
• Why do coaches -- and Brewster in particular -- talk so much about effort? Effort isn't to be rewarded; it is to be expected. Playing well is far different, more difficult and more important than accumulating meaningless moral victories.
• Wouldn't it show more gumption to play well from the start than to wait until the situation is hopeless? Isn't waiting until the second half a sign of procrastination, of slacker behavior or, perhaps, being just not that good? Should you really take pride in making the game close only because of a late punt block that produced a touchdown?
• Why would long-time Gophers football fans expect anything different than a bad loss to a bad team that leaves the Gophs headed toward a losing record in a bad league and a meaningless bowl?
• Can we Taser anyone who suggests that a 6-6 record this season, given the mediocrity of the Big Ten, is an accomplishment, or a sign of progress?