DES MOINES, Iowa — Iowa on Thursday proposed an alternative program to address child hunger during next year's summer break, a plan that the state says can leverage existing community-driven infrastructure and prioritize nutrition, but critics — including a federal agency — say takes resources and agency away from low-income families.
Iowa and other states opted out of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's summer EBT program in 2024, which offered $120 per school-aged child to low-income families for grocery purchases over the summer months.
More than 244,000 children were provided the pandemic summer EBT cards in 2023, according to the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services, amounting to over $29 million in federal funds.
Iowa instead devoted $900,000 in competitive grants that led to 61 new sites for other federal nutrition programs that facilitate schools and nonprofit organizations in low-income areas serving summer meals and snacks to kids.
Next year, Iowa wants to again forgo the EBT option and instead offer grocery boxes each of the three summer months. Kelly Garcia, director of the state's health and human services agency, said the proposal allows Iowa to buy in bulk to stretch program dollars, offset inflation costs for families, choose nutritional foods to fill boxes and increase the number of families that are eligible.
''The complex issues of food insecurity and obesity cannot be solved with cash benefits that don't actively promote health, nutrition-dense food, or reach all Iowa children in need,'' said Kelly Garcia, director of Iowa's health and human services agency.
In a statement to the Des Moines Register, the USDA said what Iowa is proposing goes against decades of research and evaluation behind a program that ''provides families with the freedom to make their own decisions on what food is best" for them.
''USDA's Summer EBT program is designed to tackle one objective: feeding kids at a time when we know hunger goes up,'' the agency said. ''Through this waiver request, the governor is asserting that the State knows better than its own families do about what their needs are."