As Dr. Rick, the fictional pitchman for Progressive Insurance, leads seminars on how not to become your parents, it's pretty clear his students have a long way to go. My favorite attendee is the guy who thinks he's hash-tagging; my favorite scene is the group's trepidation when asked to open a PDF.
You would think our analog-to-digital conversion would be further along, given the abundance of digitally connected doorbells, washing machines, smoke alarms, sprinklers, garage doors and sump pumps.
But alas, we still make fun of those who haven't boarded the digital train. Even the Oxford English Dictionary has gotten into the act with one of its definitions of "analog": "Unaware of or unaffected by computer technology or digital communication; outdated, old-fashioned."
Calling Dr. Rick.
Along with the multitude of other everyday tasks we've sent to analog pasture, everyday handwriting has been largely replaced by the use of computer keyboards, smartphone screens and voice recognition. With little need for a pad and pen, we take tests, write letters, make grocery lists, and text our family and friends — mostly with fast thumbs or slow index fingers.
The advantages of texts and e-mails are obvious. But is something lost when we abandon handwriting?
This question is a hot topic among elementary school teachers. Should children even learn cursive writing (or printing, for that matter), or is keyboarding a more practical use of limited time and resources?
Or do we impede learning when we sever the connections between the brain, the nervous system, and the fine motor skills required to process and write down a thought?