Everywhere I went at the Beijing Olympics, people stopped me to ask about the Twins. And that was just the Chinese.
The question most often asked was, "How are the Twins doing it?"
The easy answer is that this is a miracle. The 2008 Twins are making up for their youth with a lack of experience, assuaging their lack of power with key injuries. Their ability to stick near the top of the standings makes little sense ... unless you grasp recent history, which tells us that this franchise has made a habit of winning.
Since the start of the 2001 season, when the Twins returned to relevance, only six big-league teams have won more games. They are the Yankees, Red Sox, Cardinals, A's, Angels and Braves.
Five of those six teams enjoy dramatic financial advantages over the Twins, whether that advantage is a new stadium, soaring media revenues, an aggressive owner or a huge, rabid fan base. Only the A's can be considered similar to the Twins in approach and wherewithal, and while the A's have won 16 more games since 2001, they seem to be on the downslope of their bell curve of success.
The Twins, conversely, are set up brilliantly for the next three or four years and the opening of their new stadium, with their key players signed to long-term deals and their best young players years from threatening the team's payroll limits.
Compare the Twins to other Midwestern middle-market teams, regardless of stadium situation or owner generosity, and you gain a true appreciation for the success of a franchise that has turned over its roster regularly and is still stuck in the awful Metrodome.
The Twins have won 695 games since the start of 2001. Compare that to the White Sox at 670, the Cubs at 647, Indians at 645, Brewers at 577, Reds at 574, Tigers at 555, Pirates at 540, and Royals at 512.