A recent column compared the cost of the constant operation of a compact fluorescent light (CFL) to a traditional incandescent light. Several readers took issue with the answer, asking:
"Why compare a 15-watt CFL bulb to a 60-watt traditional bulb? That's not an apples-to-apples comparison; no wonder the CFL came out ahead."
Or:
"Why give such a long life to CFLs in the formula? They don't last that long. So that makes the formula you used wrong."
And:
"CFLS can't be used outdoors. So why even compare them to regular lights?"
Here are the answers to those questions:
• Actually, the fairest comparison is between a 60-watt incandescent light bulb and a 15-watt CFL. That's because a 15-watt CFL produces about the same amount of light as a 60-watt incandescent light. The issue is about light provided, not watts -- specifically, how much it will cost to light an area all day, every day. A CFL will do it for less because it produces light so much more efficiently. A lumen is the measure of light produced by a lamp. A standard 60-watt incandescent lamp produces 860 lumens, or about 14 lumens per watt of energy. A 15-watt CFL produces about the same amount of light but at a much greater efficiency, 60 to 70 lumens per watt.