EEOC issues new guide on how employers should screen job candidates' criminal records

Guidance comes after years of confusion and fine tuning

April 26, 2012 at 8:47PM

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission did employers a huge favor Wednesday when they freshened guidelines on how companies should use criminal background checks in deciding whether to hire a job candidate. An EEOC commission voted 4-1 Wednesday to approve the new enforcement guidance. The rules now come with a question and answer sheet and some "best practices" to adopt. Take a peek at www.eeoc.gov. "The new guidance clarifies and updates the EEOC's longstanding policy concerning the use of arrest and conviction records in employment, which will assist job seekers, employers, and many other agency stakeholders," said EEOC Chairwoman Jacqueline Berrien. Turns out, using only an arrest record to disqualify a candidate is NOT all right. Anyone can be arrested for any number of reasons. A conviction? Now that's another matter. "The fact of an arrest does not establish that criminal conduct has occurred. Arrest records are not probative of criminal conduct," EEOC officials said in the new guidance materials. In contrast, "conviction records are considered reliable evidence that the underlying criminal conduct occurred." The EEOC's main concern is that a job candidate not be denied employment for some meaningless arrest that happened ages ago and that had nothing to do with the job opening at hand. That is particularly important if the job candidate is a minority. In issuing its revised enforcement guidance EEOC officials explained the following:

In short, having too rigid of a screening process may disproportionately affect certain jobseekers decades. Employment attorneys in the Twin Cities said they coach their corporate clients to be on alert. Say a 30-year-old job candidate is applying for a data entry job at a company that will require no travel. The HR manager at that firm would have a hard time justifying denying the candidate because he was convicted 12 years ago of driving while under the influence of alcohol. The conviction has nothing to do with the job at hand, attorneys said. In an effort to clarify how companies should screen potential workers, the EEOC held public meetings, took written comments and answered countless questions. Its new guidance now discusses:

The EEOC has made its testimonies and transcripts and other materials from public meetings available at http://eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/index.cfm.

about the writer

about the writer

Dee DePass

Reporter

Dee DePass is an award-winning business reporter covering Minnesota small businesses for the Minnesota Star Tribune. She previously covered commercial real estate, manufacturing, the economy, workplace issues and banking.

See Moreicon

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
card image
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, ASSOCIATED PRESS/The Minnesota Star Tribune

The "winners" have all been Turkeys, no matter the honor's name.

In this photo taken Monday, March 6, 2017, in San Francisco, released confidential files by The University of California of a sexual misconduct case, like this one against UC Santa Cruz Latin Studies professor Hector Perla is shown. Perla was accused of raping a student during a wine-tasting outing in June 2015. Some of the files are so heavily redacted that on many pages no words are visible. Perla is one of 113 UC employees found to have violated the system's sexual misconduct policies in rece