THE HAGUE, Netherlands — On Dutch Openness Day, this year's release of secret documents from state archives suddenly left Peter Baas with fundamental questions about his father's stature as a World War II resistance fighter.
While many were cleaning up the mess from New Year's Eve fireworks on Jan. 1, hundreds of thousands of others in the Netherlands looked for their relatives in a new database containing the names of some 425,000 people investigated for collaboration with the Nazis from 1940-45.
Some looked out of curiosity, others out of concern.
A controversial topic
One of those names was Ludolf Baas, a resistance fighter who taped microfilm of Nazi atrocities to his body and smuggled it over enemy lines. ''When I saw my father's name, I was shocked,'' Peter Baas told The Associated Press. He wondered if his father's legacy was a lie and needed to find out if one of society's ugliest stigmas would also stick to him.
''The publication of the list of names has caused great social unrest,'' the NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, said in a statement Friday. The research organization, founded days after the Netherlands was liberated, has called for the government to intervene.
Nazi collaboration is a controversial topic in the Netherlands and much of Europe and is often shrouded in family mystery and stifled under a cloak of silence. Initially, the Netherlands was long seen as a welcoming safe haven for persecuted groups. Many Jewish families, like that of famed diarist Anne Frank, fled Germany in the 1930s for the relative safety of their Dutch neighbors.
That changed when the Dutch surrendered to the Germans in 1940. Only 27% of the Dutch Jewish population survived the war, significantly less than the survival rate in France and Belgium and collaboration made persecution easier.