The party of law and order had a confounding take on the attempted coup at the Capitol on Jan. 6. The party's leader, President Donald Trump, called the agents of this unlawfulness and disorder "very special" people and "patriots." In fact, he loves them.
Republican rank and file registered disapproval of the insurrection, but showed little interest in holding to account the man on whose account the riot occurred. Without Trump there simply would have been no insurrection. Nobody put this better than the third-highest-ranking House Republican, Liz Cheney, who, breaking ranks, said:
"The President of the United States summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that followed was his doing. None of this would have happened without the President. There has never been a greater betrayal by a President of the United States of his office and his oath to the Constitution."
Republican House Leader Kevin McCarthy agreed: "The president bears responsibility for Wednesday's attack on Congress by mob rioters." Of course. And yet all but 10 of the Republican representatives in the House voted to give Trump a pass on the riot that would never have happened without him.
They relied on various rationales for opposing impeachment. Some didn't see the point of punishing a coup attempted during the last 10 days of an administration, missing the point that often it's just when autocrats are about to lose power that they attempt coups.
Others, true to form, blamed the Democrats merely for doing what the opposition party does, which is to oppose. Just imagine: Impeaching Trump the first time when he got caught leaning hard on an ally to produce dirt on a political opponent. Read the transcript.
But the most disingenuous rationale is the notion that holding Trump accountable would be divisive. A number of representatives said that the country needs "unity" and "healing." They appear to be willing to accept nearly any abuse of the Constitution in order to "bring us together."
This rings a bit hollow coming from politicians who support a man whose stock-in-trade is division. But it also misunderstands two important tenets of democracy: