Opinion editor’s note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
In response to Annette Meeks’ piece “Get rid of Minnesota’s precinct caucuses, go to primary elections up and down the ballot” on April 24, and former Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak’s “We needn’t be bound by caucuses” published on May 1, I’d like to offer not a rebuttal, but a “yes, and.”
Meeks and Rybak are right about the partisanship that is perpetrated at the local caucus gatherings. They are right about the small number of people who are granted outsized influence in the power to decide which candidates appear on ballots.
Want to know the great thing about their being right? The power to shape the ballot, to influence who gets to run and who doesn’t, lies entirely in your hands. Voters and candidates don’t need to wait for political parties to change their processes. And voters can deploy that power right now, in this election year.
Endorsements achieve the goal of narrowing the number of names on the primary ballot only if other candidates abide by the endorsement decision and stop running.
One of the reasons endorsement conventions are held early in the year is to discourage a lot of candidates from running in the primary. The people who participate in the endorsement decisions, including and especially candidates, have a personal stake in that being the case.
But every candidate has the option to keep running even if they didn’t get the endorsement. There’s no legal obligation holding them back. Abiding by an endorsement is a part of the political tradition, not an ironclad rule.