A phone call was all it took.
Bill Hanley's 92-year-old mother, Carol, had been diagnosed with renal failure and her only hope of survival was dialysis. The doctors recommended it, and Hanley assumed his mother would pursue it.
But at her age, she was not interested in the difficult treatment. Hanley's parents, siblings and children all joined on a conference call, "and we all at the same time got to hear my mom very unequivocally express her preferences." He knew, then, that he had to honor her wishes. Carol died a few weeks later.
Talking about one's own death can be awkward and emotional. But what was once just a suggestion could become routine because of a change in the law.
The Obama administration this summer proposed reimbursing doctors for advance care planning conversations with Medicare patients. Coming seven years after the highly political "death panels" debate, the Medicare decision applies to Americans age 65 and up and is slated to begin in January.
While advocates laud the change, many say it doesn't go far enough. They argue that the conversation needs to begin long before a senior or terminally ill patient walks through the doors of a doctor's office.
How much medical intervention do I want to undergo in order to extend my life? Am I willing to survive in a vegetative state, using a breathing machine, or on a feeding tube? If I am not able to make treatment decisions, who should decide for me?
While completing an advance directive with answers to questions like those is the best insurance that a patient's wishes will be carried out, advocates are pushing for more dialogue among families and loved ones, with spiritual leaders, within ethnic communities and in the classroom, starting as early as age 18.