The best thing we can do when it comes to the coronavirus pandemic is learn and adjust. Good example:
The early word was that masks weren't going to help much. That changed, and a lot of us bought in.
When it comes to big-time sports, we're learning what works and what doesn't work. Forming bubbles — essentially safe zones where athletes don't leave and are tested often for the virus — seems to work quite well.
The NBA, WNBA and NHL have been humming along nicely without much of a hitch in their various bubbles. Major League Baseball? Um, not so great. Most teams, like the Twins, are doing OK. Some have had major disruptions from virus outbreaks.
The St. Louis Blues have played four NHL games in August, while the St. Louis Cardinals have played zero MLB games. That should tell you a lot about the weirdness of sports in 2020 but also the relative effectiveness of bubble vs. no bubble.
Baseball is already talking about shifting to a bubble for the playoffs, which would be smart. If the NFL was smart, it would be pivoting to a bubble right now. Maybe they will at some point?
The assumption — at least from me, but I also think from plenty of others — was that one of the particular challenges facing college sports was that a bubble environment isn't feasible. The biggest reason: these are, ahem, student-athletes and as long as some schools are having classes in-person it isn't possible to send athletes to a central location for months at a time just to play sports. That's doable for pros who are under contract, but not college athletes.
But in the wake of the Big Ten, Pac-12 and other smaller conferences postponing fall sports — including, of course, the big moneymaker college football — it appears as if the other big college sports cash cow, college basketball, is at least exploring the logistics of playing some sort of season in a bubble.