LONDON — A year ago, Peter Mandelson was Britain's ambassador to Washington, the latest high-profile post in a rocky but consequential political career.
Friendship with Jeffrey Epstein cost him that job. Now, after new revelations, Mandelson — like other powerful men including King Charles III's brother Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — is facing new demands he come clean about his relationship with the late sex offender.
Mandelson resigned from the governing Labour Party on Sunday following new claims he received payments from Epstein two decades ago. Mandelson said he was stepping aside to avoid causing ''further embarrassment,'' even as he denied the allegations stemming from a trove of more than 3 million pages of documents relating to Epstein released by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who fired Mandelson from his ambassadorial job over earlier revelations about his Epstein ties, is now urging him to quit politics altogether and testify in the U.S. about what he knew of the financier's activities.
Some opposition politicians called for a criminal investigation into Mandelson over claims he gave Epstein sensitive government information. The Metropolitan Police force said it had received ''a number of reports relating to alleged misconduct in a public office'' and would review them "to determine if they meet the criminal threshold for investigation.''
Starmer urged Mandelson on Monday to resign from the House of Lords — Parliament's unelected upper chamber of politicians, donors and assorted notables — to which he was appointed for life in 2008. That would also mean relinquishing his noble title, Lord Mandelson.
If he refuses, ejecting him would be a lengthy process requiring Parliament to pass legislation — a process last undertaken more than a century ago to remove the titles of aristocrats who sided with Germany in World War I.
''The prime minister believes that Peter Mandelson should not be a member of the House of Lords or use the title,'' said Starmer spokesman Tom Wells. ''However, the prime minister does not have the power to remove it.''