I'll admit that I had no idea when TripAdvisor debuted in February 2000 that it would become a force to be reckoned with. I am still often amazed at how this little website, a jumble of hotel reviews contributed by anyone with access to a computer, grew to exert so much influence in the lodging industry that a whole new area of marketing has grown up around it.
Today, there are workshops, professional courses, spin doctors to help hoteliers and hospitality professionals use the power of TripAdvisor to their advantage.
And sometimes repair the damage from a bad review.
But here's a new tactic — at least one I hadn't heard of.
Tony and Jan Jenkinson, a retired British couple, stayed one night at the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool, England, and posted a review of the hotel on TripAdvisor, calling the establishment a "rotten, stinking hovel."
The price of the room was 36 pounds, about $56 at current exchange rates, but the couple's credit card was charged an additional 100 pounds after the review showed up on TripAdvisor. The Jenkinsons said the extra charge was a fine for the negative review. The couple brought this particular image-control tactic to the attention of authorities.
Tony Jenkinson acknowledged in an interview with the BBC that the 100-pound fine was hotel policy disclosed in the small print of the hotel's booking form. He said that unfortunately his wife wasn't wearing her glasses when she signed the form, so she didn't read the fine print and had no idea of the policy.
Right there in the fine print
The policy states: "Despite the fact that repeat customers and couples love our hotel, your friends and family may not.