Peter Moore: I have a confession to make.
Karin Winegar: If this involves you, a bottle of Jack Daniel's and a small woodland animal, I don't want to hear about it.
PM: No, it's just this: I'm not sure how I feel about David Sedaris.
KW: I'm sure he'll be crushed to hear that.
PM: I mean, here I am, about to review his new collection of comic essays, tens upon tens of eager readers breathlessly awaiting my thumbs up or down, and I find myself feeling pretty ambivalent about the whole thing. How about you?
KW: I'm probably not the person to ask. Lately I've been working my way through Patrick O'Brian's seafaring novels, and I get a little resentful about being pulled away from Lucky Jack Aubrey and the War of 1812 during a reconnaissance mission on a sloop in the Baltic Sea off the cost of Prussia.
PM: Heave to for just a minute, OK? I think Sedaris writes pretty well, and while I somewhat enjoy his off-kilter take on ordinary things, I also find him a little too self-absorbed to be really interesting. My impulse is to damn the book with faint praise and use such words as "amusing" and "humorous," maybe even "witty," but not the big guns such as "hilarious" or "brilliant" or even "charming."
KW: If you like a sort of Oscar Wilde witty languor, an amused droll view-from-the-velvet-chaise sort of cultural sniping, Sedaris is your man. But speaking of big guns, I could be reading about 64-gun brigs firing their bow chasers and toppling the enemy's mizzen topgallants onto the splinter netting while Lucky Jack, a musket ball in his right arm, switches his saber to his left to prepare to repel the enemy. ...