Seven to 10 times a day, Jaeson Morrison's phone rings. Someone in Richfield is worried about a tree.
An old elm looks weird. Something horrible is growing on a hackberry. A tree has bugs -- is it emerald ash borer?
So Morrison, a tree inspector who six months from now will probably be driving a snowplow, hops into his Richfield Public Works car -- a converted police black-and-white -- and goes out to take a look.
This year's discovery of emerald ash borer in St. Paul has communities around the Twin Cities scrambling to develop plans for identification and disposal of thousands of infected ash trees. City foresters say they're busier than ever. But demand for tree expertise is coming at the same time cities are cutting budgets.
In many places, including Richfield, the job of city forester has been combined with other duties.
"I believe that cities across the state lack the capacity to respond to emerald ash borer," said Katie Himanga, president of the Minnesota Shade Tree Advisory Committee, which advises the state and Legislature on urban tree issues. "I'm concerned that urban forestry has been so eroded in communities that there might not even be a person to get up to speed on emerald ash borer and get the information out, let alone update city ordinances."
Ken Holman, community forestry coordinator for the state Department of Natural Resources, said he thinks the 500 Minnesota cities that have state-certified tree inspectors are holding off on cutting positions because of worry about emerald ash borer. But Craig Johnson, a lobbyist with the League of Minnesota Cities who, like Himanga and Holman, serves on the shade tree committee, isn't sure that's enough to save those jobs.
When budget-pressed cities have to choose between "keeping a half-time police officer or inspecting trees, there's no contest," Johnson said. "The trees can't win."