Your Smithee Highness: Love reading your columns each week. I'm noticing that a lot of acting Oscars and nominations in recent years have gone to performers playing the role of an actual person.
Some I truly believe to be great acting performances (Forest Whitaker as Idi Amin and Phillip Seymour Hoffman as Truman Capote), but others I wonder if they're only a really good imitation (Cate Blanchett as Kate Hepburn and Will Smith as Ali). Your thoughts?
MICHAEL TUCKER, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA.
Your Steady Lowness: I have no idea how any thinking individual could place a descriptive word like "good" anywhere near Cate Blanchett's forgettable misstep in "The Aviator." She probably won the Oscar because voters felt sorry for her.
In the past 10 Oscar shows, 15 performers have won for portraying real-life people -- from Marion Cotillard ("La Vie En Rose") to Judi Dench ("Shakespeare in Love") with actors such as Reese Witherspoon ("Walk the Line") and Helen Mirren ("The Queen") in between.
In truth, the Academy Awards have pretty much always loved the biopic performance. Think George Arliss ("Disraeli"), Charles Laughton ("The Private Life of Henry VIII"), Paul Muni ("The Story of Louis Pasteur"), Gary Cooper ("Sergeant York"), James Cagney ("Yankee Doodle Dandy"), Joanne Woodward ("The Three Faces of Eve"), Susan Hayward ("I Want to Live!"), Anne Bancroft and Patty Duke ("The Miracle Worker") and Barbra Streisand ("Funny Girl").
There are Oscar voters (I know this because I've talked with them about it) who refuse to cast a ballot for anyone playing a well-known real-life individual. They believe it much harder to create a character from the page.
I'm not so sure about that. One of the hardest jobs would be to play someone so well known -- like Ray Charles -- and make me believe the actor is the legendary figure. Jamie Foxx sure did that. And I, for one, was happy that Will Smith, instead of playing himself as he so often does in films, actually had to act in "Ali" and pulled it off.