CHARLOTTE, N.C. - When Brett Favre revealed his frustration at Brad Childress' willingness to bench him Sunday night, you could almost hear the collective gasp of Vikings fans.
Unlike most of the people you'll hear and read on the subject, I recommend exhaling.
A nation's football fans will see this as a sign of Favre's noted ego, or an indication that Childress lacks control, or that the infamous and fraudulent "schism" story regarding Favre's place in the Vikings' locker room should be applied to his relationship with his new coach.
My question is: What did you expect? At some point this season, Favre and Childress were going to quarrel over playing time.
Favre isn't exactly accustomed to sitting on the bench, not during a career in which he set a record for consecutive games played, and not during a season that might be his last; and Childress is charged with maintaining Favre's health as best he can.
In this case, I agree with Favre -- I find it strange that a coach determined to see his team surge into the playoffs would consider benching his Hall of Fame quarterback while his team had the lead and his quarterback had yet to throw an interception despite playing under heavy pressure.
We should be congratulating Childress on becoming more flexible in his dealings with his quarterback. Brad Johnson and Gus Frerotte left town upset with Childress' unwillingness to cede control; with Favre, Childress has had little choice but to allow his quarterback more input and control, and that, until Sunday night, had been one of many reasons the Vikings were considered perhaps the most complete team in the NFC.
This isn't high school football, where the coach is part father, part disciplinarian. This isn't college football, where the coach is king and, if successful, will outlast any problematic players.