A comparison: CFLs vs. incandescents

December 9, 2009 at 8:35PM

Q You recently answered a question about how much it would cost to burn a bulb in a hallway 24 hours a day, seven days a week. I think you missed an opportunity to compare that cost to an energy-efficient bulb. So, if that light has to remain on, how much would you save if the bulb were a compact fluorescent (CFL) as opposed to a traditional incandescent?

A Energy specialist Phil Smith, at the Minnesota Department of Energy Security offered the following assessment:

The annual cost of operating a 60-watt incandescent light bulb is $47.30.

The annual cost of operating a 15-watt CFL is $11.86.

But there's more to it than that.

A 60-watt bulb has a life expectancy of 1,000 hours.

A 15-watt CFL has a life expectancy of 8,000 to 10,000 hours.

It is reasonable to assume that you'd need eight 60-watt bulbs to light the hall in question 24 hours a day for one year, but you'd only need one CFL for the same time period.

Current pricing per bulb (a web-based price comparison at local retail outlets) shows CFLs costing $ 1.46 each, while incandescents cost 74 cents.

So, for now, the total annual cost, including bulbs, would be $13.29 if you used a CFL bulb, and $53.24 for an incandescent bulb.

Send your questions to Fixit in care of the Star Tribune, 425 Portland Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55488, or call 612-673-7032, or e-mail fixit@startribune.com. Past columns are available at www.startribune.com/fixit. Sorry, Fixit cannot supply individual replies. Fixit appears every day except Friday.

about the writer

about the writer

KAREN YOUSO, Star Tribune

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
card image
Provided/Sahan Journal

Family members and a lawyer say they have been blocked from access to the bedside of Bonfilia Sanchez Dominguez, while her husband was detained and shipped to Texas within 24 hours.

card image