Beneficial electrification, the transition from fossil fuels to electricity for various energy needs, is a hot topic in government, and throughout the energy industry. As community leaders consider how to promote electrification, they are exploring ways their policies can benefit businesses by blending environmental stewardship with economic efficiency.
Policymakers focused on beneficial electrification in buildings are setting new standards and goals for their communities, which can create opportunities for businesses interested in using electricity instead of fossil fuels like natural gas, propane, or fuel oil for heating, running appliances or operating machinery in their buildings.
As Minnesota businesses navigate this fluctuating landscape, understanding what is driving these emerging trends is pivotal in harnessing the full potential of electrification initiatives.
Factoring in the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC)
One key trend shaping beneficial electrification is the integration of the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) into cost-effectiveness testing. SCC is a way to calculate the financial impact of each additional unit of carbon emissions released in terms of climate and other impacts on society.
By factoring in SCC, the full value of strategically displacing fossil fuels becomes apparent. It can help regulators identify which fossil fuel applications should be the focus of initiatives and helps justify and align programs with the community’s broader environmental and policy goals.
In the future, businesses may have the SCC of their fossil fuel use included in calculations used to determine eligibility for beneficial electrification projects. Legislation in states like Massachusetts and Colorado underscores this trend, directing business program administrators to incorporate SCC into cost-effectiveness assessments, emphasizing the broader societal benefits of electrification.
A Nationwide Yet Local Effort Coordinating Utilities and Communities