A Vatican researcher has rekindled the age-old debate over the Shroud of Turin, saying that faint writing on the linen proves it was the burial cloth of Jesus.
Barbara Frale says in a new book that she used computer-enhanced images of the shroud (the facial area at left) to decipher faintly written words in Greek, Latin and Aramaic that include the name Jesus of Nazareth in Greek. That, she said, proves the text could not be of medieval origin because no Christian at the time, even a forger, would have mentioned Jesus without referring to his divinity. Failing to do so would risk being branded a heretic. "Even someone intent on forging a relic would have had all the reasons to place the signs of divinity on this object," Frale said Friday. "Had we found 'Christ' or the 'Son of God' we could have considered it a hoax, or a devotional inscription." Experts say the historian may be reading too much into the markings, and they stand by carbon-dating that points to the shroud being a medieval forgery.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
See thousands of photos from other StarTribune.com readers and share your own photos and video today.
StarTribune.com: Steals + Deals & Classifieds


Comment on this story | Read all 2 comments | Hide reader comments