UN Security Council authorizes cross-border delivery of aid to Syrians in rebel-held areas

  • Article by: EDITH M. LEDERER , Associated Press
  • Updated: July 14, 2014 - 3:00 PM

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council unanimously approved a resolution Monday authorizing cross-border delivery of humanitarian aid to Syrians in rebel-held areas in desperate need of food and medicine, without government approval.

U.N. humanitarian chief Valerie Amos said several weeks ago that opening these routes could help 1.3 million Syrians — and her office said Monday that if security allows, aid could reach 2.9 million people.

The resolution, a rare agreement on Syria among the often divided council, expresses "grave alarm at the significant and rapid deterioration of the humanitarian situation in Syria." It deplores the fact that the council's previous demands for humanitarian access "have not been heeded" by the government and opposition fighters.

The United States and many European council members said the resolution would not have been necessary if the Syrian government, especially, had complied with a February resolution demanding that all sides allow immediate access for aid.

Since February, however, President Bashar Assad has continued to bar cross-border deliveries to rebel areas and insist that all shipments go through the capital Damascus, which has meant the overwhelming majority of aid has gone to government-controlled areas.

Monthly reports to the council since February by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on the resolution's implementation have described an increasingly dire situation.

Amos told the council on June 26 that the number of Syrians in need of humanitarian assistance has increased from one million in 2011 to 10.8 million, jumping 1.5 million in just the last six months. That includes 4.7 million in hard-to-reach areas, and over 240,000 trapped in besieged areas.

Australia's U.N. Ambassador Gary Quinlan, who co-sponsored the resolution with Jordan and Luxembourg, called the situation in Syria "the greatest humanitarian crisis this century," adding that only 1 percent of people in besieged areas and only 12 percent in hard-to-reach areas are currently getting aid.

He said the resolution adopted Monday takes "practical steps" to overcome the Syrian government's opposition.

The Security Council authorized U.N. agencies and aid organizations that assist them to deliver humanitarian assistance across conflict lines between government and rebel forces and through four border crossings — two in Turkey, one in Iraq and one in Jordan without government approval. It authorized the United Nations to monitor the loading of all aid shipments in the three countries before they cross the Syrian border.

The U.N.'s most powerful body has never been able to adopt a legally binding resolution demanding an end to the Syrian conflict, now in its fourth year with over 150,000 people killed, because of insurmountable differences between Russia and China, key allies of Assad, and the United States and its European allies, who have backed the opposition. It did overcome difference to adopt resolution last September ordering the elimination of Syria's chemical weapons and February's humanitarian resolution.

Monday's vote culminated weeks of negotiations between the two sides. The sponsors initially wanted the resolution to be under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which can be enforced militarily, but early on the Russians and Chinese objected.

Instead, the resolution underscores that all 193 U.N. member states are obligated under Article 25 of the Charter "to accept and carry out the council's decisions," and it affirms that the council "will take further measures in the event of non-compliance with this resolution" or the one adopted in February.

Secretary-General Ban welcomed the adoption and called on the government, opposition forces, and all those with influence over them to ensure "unconditional humanitarian access to all people in need without discrimination, using all available routes," lifting of the illegal sieges, an end to violations of international humanitarian law, and the safety of humanitarian workers, his spokesman said.

"It's a good, strong resolution and it should make a significant difference on the ground," Britain's U.N. Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power said a Security Council resolution should never be required "for a government to allow food and medicine to reach millions of families whose lives have been hanging in the balance" but the Assad government "seized every opportunity to make it more and not less difficult to provide such crucial assistance."

"Today, we are taking steps to ensure that our resolution from February has a real impact on the ground, unlocking the impediments that stand in the way of cross-border assistance," Power said. "The effectiveness of today's resolution will depend on the efforts and the cooperation of many parties, including the United Nations and humanitarian agencies."

Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin underscored that there are no automatic sanctions in the draft.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close