Remember a time when weekends meant errands, yard work, naps and downtime? I don't either. Today many of us are checking e-mails, texts and work demands around the clock. We're on call, even if it's on a Sunday, the (alleged) "day of rest". Right.
Sadly, weather doesn't take the weekend off - in fact meteorologists are even more hyper-sensitive to gyrations in the weather on Saturdays and Sundays, since more of us are outside, more vulnerable to the elements. More weather-aware.
"Will it rain between 6 and 8 PM?" my wife barked into the phone yesterday. "I'm putting stucco on today, what time will it rain in Minnetonka?" a friend just texted. "If it pours I'm going to track you down!"
Stand in line.
Note to self: one good radar app on your phone can save a lot of time and aggravation. We're all armchair meteorologists now.
A sloppy cool front keeps rain showers in the forecast thru midday; skies may dry out late in the day but temperatures hold in the 60s. A D+ day weatherwise, I fear. Sunday looks better with blue sky and 70s, a better day to troll The Edina Art Fair.
Showers Monday gives way to a drier sky and warming temperatures next week. The approach of a hot front sparks more late-week storms; sultry 90F readings are possible by next Sunday.
.27" rain predicted this morning in the Twin Cities (00z NAM).
.80" of additional rain Sunday night into Monday morning.
Hints of Early July Next Week? The 6-10 day extended outlook for jet stream steering winds at 500 mb, about 18,000 feet above the ground, shows a lingering trough sparking showers and cooler than normal temperatures over the Pacific Northwest. East of the Rockies an expanding heat dome will push slowly north, sparking numerous 90s over the southern half of the USA. Map: NOAA.
Weather Hazards Next Week. Drought conditions continue to worsen from west Texas and the Oklahoma Panhandle to California next week with little or no rain. Meanwhile heavy showers and T-storms are likely from Tulsa and Little Rock to Louisville, another potential for downpours over the Upper Midwest.
From Record Drought to Biblical Floods. Mother Nature is setting a whole new standard for weather-whiplash over the southern Plains; portions of Oklahoma expected to go from exceptional drought to extensive flooding. NOAA models show as much as 6-8" or more of rain, with flash flooding prevalent into the Middle Mississippi Valley. Some 2-3" amounts are expected across FLorida, with 1-3" amounts extending into the Mid Atlantic region. Map: NOAA.
Wet Start to June. Dr. Mark Seeley has updated information on nitrogen fertilizer loss due to recent heavy rains and resources farmers can turn to for more information. Here's an excerpt with rainfall amounts from the downpours of late May and early June at this week's installment of Minnesota WeatherTalk: "... The heaviest rains were concentrated in central and southern counties. Belle Plaine reported nearly 5 inches as did Onamia. In the south Redwood Falls reported 4.75 inches, Luverne 4.13 inches, and Winnebago 5.29 inches. Many farmers reported standing ponds of water in their freshly planted fields. Portions of the Crow River, Sauk River, and Buffalo Creek all rose to near or above flood stage due to heavy runoff..."
No El Nino Yet, Still Expected This Summer. NOAA CPC has raised the odds of El Nino conditions from 65% to 70% this summer, rising to 80% by autumn and winter. Here's an excerpt of an update at Climate Central: "...The Climate Prediction Center, part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, issued its latest monthly outlook on the state of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (or ENSO, the name for the broader phenomenon) on Thursday, with little change from last month’s update. The only differences were a slight increase in the probability that El Niño will be in place this summer, and a tentative guess at how strong that El Niño might turn out to be. “There’s no big game changer there,” said Michelle L’Heureux, a CPC meteorologist who helps put together the outlooks..."
Animation credit above: "Animation of sea surface temperatures in the tropical Pacific Ocean." Credit: NOAA.
Disaster Experts Crafting Plan to Mitigate Natural Disasters. The challenge is to play offense, not just defense, and use money to help communities to be better prepared for inevitable natural disasters. The Wall Street Journal has the story - here's a clip that caught my eye: "...Repairing the damage caused by natural disasters has cost more than $200 billion globally in three out of the last four years, but 96% of that money was spent on recovery, and only 4% on boosting readiness, according to Kristalina Georgieva, the E.U. Commissioner for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response. Yet every dollar spent on disaster risk reduction would slash up to $7 from the post-disaster reconstruction bill, Ms. Georgieva said at the conference..."
The 2014 India Monsoon Season: The Most Important Forecast in the World. Because if those rains don't come, like clockwork, crops may fail, threatening millions. This year El Nino may throw a monkey-wrench into the monsoon signal; here's a clip from a story from Eric Holthaus at Slate: "It’s about to start raining in India, but not quite yet. That’s big news in a country where about half of the 1.25 billion population is engaged in agriculture. Each year, 70 percent of India’s annual rains come during the summer monsoon months of June to September, when rising warm air over the subcontinent draws moisture northward from the relatively cooler Indian Ocean. This year, thanks in part to El Niño, the outlook is grim..."
Edyn Smart Garden Monitoring System Helps Your Garden Grow. So much technology, so little time. Here's a clip from a story at Gizmag: "It's not always easy to find the time to research the ideal plants for your garden and then make sure they're given the attention they need to flourish. Edyn was developed to help users monitor and track environmental conditions in their garden, provide guidance on how conditions can be improved and water the plants automatically as required. The smart garden system comprises a sensor, a smart water-valve and a mobile app..."
It's Baaack. Another reason to go on living - the release of Sharknado 2 is imminent, and I'm giddy with excitement. Sharknado 1 was so bad it was actually good, and we have high hopes for the sequel. Here's a link to the trailer from Vulture: "Remember the worldwide, internet-fueled phenomenon that was Sharknado? SyFy expectedly fast-tracked its sequel, subtitled "The Second One," and here's your first look. The whole gang is back: Tara Reid, Ian Ziering, that other girl. Prepare your hashtags."
Nailing The Forecast. Thanks to Mark Anderson at andertoons.com for getting the weather report right.
84 F. high in the Twin Cities Friday.
76 F. average high on June 6.
58 F. high on June 6, 2013.
Trace of rain at MSP International Airport yesterday.
June 6, 1939: Grapefruit-sized hail fell in Rock County killing hundreds of farm animals near Hills.
TODAY: Cool, gray and showery. Winds: N 10-15. High: 65
SATURDAY NIGHT: Slow clearing, cooler. Low: 51
SUNDAY: Plenty of sun, much better. Winds: NE 8. High: 75
SUNDAY NIGHT: Showers, possibly heavy. Low: 56
MONDAY: Heavy showers early, then drying out later. High: 77
TUESDAY: Partly sunny, warming up. Wake-up: 59. High: 82
WEDNESDAY: Clouds increase, PM T-storms. Wake-up: 62. High: near 80
THURSDAY: Sunny, breezy and less humid. Wake-up: 58. High: 79
FRIDAY: Unsettled. Another round of storms possible. Wake-up: 60. High: 83
The Health Impacts of Climate Change on Americans. The White House released an 8-page PDF describing impacts that are already manifesting themselves, from an increase in asthma to a 21 day longer pollen season in the Twin Cities. Here's an excerpt: "...climate change has resulted in more frost-free days and warmer air temperatures which can, in turn, cause a greater production of plant-based allergens. For example, the length of ragweed seasons has increased in some communities in the northern states. Minneapolis, Minnesota's season increased by 21 days, while ragweed season in Fargo, North Dakota increased by 19 days. Higher pollen concentrations and longer pollen seasons can increase pollen-related allergies and asthma episodes that lead to diminished productivity and lost school days..."
The Climate Domino. Here's a snippet of an Op-Ed about the new EPA regulations on CO2 impacting coal-fired power plants around the USA from Paul Krugman at The New York Times: "...For what it’s worth, however, the attacks on the new rules mainly involve the three C’s: conspiracy, cost and China. That is, right-wingers claim that there isn’t any global warming, that it’s all a hoax promulgated by thousands of scientists around the world; that taking action to limit greenhouse gas emissions would devastate the economy; and that, anyway, U.S. policy can’t accomplish anything because China will just go on spewing stuff into the atmosphere..."
Will New EPA Power Plant Rules Trade Carbon for Methane? The shift that's already underway to lower polluting natural gas is a positive step, since natural gas emits roughly half as much CO2 into the atmosphere when burned. But leaking well caps can leak methane into the air, which is has 20 times the heat-trapping potential of carbon, as pointed out in this article at Christian Science Monitor; here's a clip: "...Since natural gas burns much cleaner than coal, producing about half as much carbon dioxide, making the switch from coal to gas can go a long way to achieving the rest of the remaining reductions, the administration seems to be thinking. The big problem is that we don’t know what’s happening with methane emissions. Natural gas, which is essentially methane (CH4), may burn cleaner than coal, but what happens when it isn’t burned? As a greenhouse gas, methane emitted into the atmosphere is more than 20 times as potent as carbon dioxide over a 100-year period..."
Will The New EPA Rules For Power Plants Inspire Other Countries? Or will they continue to ramp up coal-fired energy and have tarrifs slapped on their products and services? Here's a clip from a story at The Washington Post: "...Most climatologists believe that sticking to the two degree number is important for avoiding widespread, and economically costly, extreme weather events. The EPA proposal cutting coal plant emissions to 30 percent below the 2005 level by 2030 is seen as a major step forward, but falls short of the 42 percent level many negotiators believe is needed for the United States to stick to the 2-degree target. The United States has not made any commitments regarding targets beyond 2020..."
Climate Change is Getting Worse. So Why Is Antarctica's Ice Sheet Expanding? Here's a clip from an explanation from The Conversation and The Washington Post: "...This year could well see a new record set for the extent of Antarctic sea ice – hot on the heels of last year’s record, which in turn is part of a puzzling 33-year trend in increasing sea ice around Antarctica. Unsurprisingly, these records have provided fodder for those wishing to cast doubt or resist action on climate change..."
7 Reasons America Will Fail on Climate Change. I'm not nearly as pessimistic, although I agree that on our current (global) trajectory keeping temperature rises below 2C may be futile. Adaptation will be a big part of the equation going forward. If you're in a happy, upbeat mood try not to read this decidedly gloomy view from Ezra Klein at Vox; here's an excerpt: "...Either way, we've waited so long to begin cutting emissions that two degrees looks flatly impossible. We're on track for 4°C of warming — which is nearly the temperature difference between the world now and the Ice Age. That's a nightmare for the planet. The World Bank tried to model it and realized that they had no idea what would happen — or whether humans could manage. There's "no certainty that adaptation to a 4°C world is possible," they concluded..."
Image credit: NOAA GFDL.
7 Reasons Why America Should Succeed On Climate Change. Joe Romm takes a much more optimistic look at what can be done to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and keep future temperature increases in a range that are tolerable. Here's an excerpt from his post at Climate Progress: "...I asked one of the country’s top climatologists, Michael Mann, who criticized this story in a tweet to comment. He wrote:
Defeatist framing is not helpful and threatens serving as self-fulfilling prophecy. We all grew up reading not “The Little Engine that Couldn’t.” The only real obstacle to averting dangerous climate change is lack of willpower and imagination. We must avoid messaging that seems to condone that, as the title of the Vox piece unfortunately does.
Over the past 8 years of blogging at Climate Progress, I have tried to focus on what the science says we should do (slash CO2 ASAP to avoid catastrophe) and what technology says we could do (as much as we need to) and what economics suggests it would cost (not bloody much)...." (Image above: NASA).