Michael Russo has covered the National Hockey League since 1995. He has covered the Minnesota Wild for the Star Tribune since 2005, after 10 years of covering the Florida Panthers for the Sun-Sentinel. He uses “Russo’s Rants” to feed a wide-ranging hockey-centric discussion with readers, and can be heard weekly on KFAN (100.3 FM) radio and seen weekly on Fox Sports North.

Also find Russo on Facebook.

Email Michael to talk about hockey.

Wild GM Chuck Fletcher on standing pat, Ballard, Spurgeon, replacing Cullen

Posted by: Michael Russo under Wild off-season news Updated: July 5, 2013 - 2:23 PM

I had a phone conversation this afternoon with Wild GM Chuck Fletcher.

With the Wild about $1 million under the cap and the need to keep room for injuries, the Wild will take a step back and let the dust settle. As of now, the depth chart below is the team. If there happens to be bargains at No. 2 center in the next few days (some guys have to be nervous, although there aren't many guys left that whet the appetite at No. 2 center), maybe Fletcher pounces. Or, maybe eventually Fletcher will make a trade. But right now, a lot will depend on kids like Charlie Coyle and Mikael Granlund next year replacing Matt Cullen, who signed a two-year, $7 million deal with Nashville.

As has been reported often, the Wild was going to have to be quieter this summer than last. It just didn't have the cap space. Next year, it'll have about $25 million, and that's before the cap ceiling increases (although, that's before an eventual Jason Pominville extension this summer, the Wild hopes).

Like I said, if there's a bargain, it wouldn't shock me if Fletcher makes a deal once jobless players start to freak. Otherwise, the next bunch of signings will be two-way guys for Iowa and to provide depth in Minnesota.

(Hey, before I forget, I've gotten a lot of questions as to why Matt Dumba can't play in Iowa. He is 18 years old. Canadian Hockey League players can't play in the minors if they're under 20. So Dumba makes the Wild or gets returned to Red Deer).

Here's Fletcher on a number of topics. Give it a read please:
At this point, the prudent thing to do is wait and let things sort out. We’ll see what happens as the summer goes on and into the fall even. There will be a lot of teams tighter to the cap this year and there may be teams looking to make player trades. We’ll see if we can make something down the road, but for right now, we’re happy with the group we have. We have a pretty good mix of young players and veteran players. I think the Ballard signing solidifies our defense position. With re-signing Backstrom and the emergence of Kuemper last year, our depth in goal is arguably as strong as its been since I’ve been here. There’s always areas where you’d love to improve if you could like every team in the league, but I think there’s a lot of positives about our team. If we can make our team better over the next few months, we’ll certainly look to do that. But I’m happy with the place we’re at right now.
Second-line center. Intent on Coyle or Granlund? Are they ready? “We’ll see if they’re ready for it. Granlund’s a talented, young player and we feel he’ll be a good NHL player in time. Whether that happens right away or not will be up to him. Charlie Coyle’s a player that proved to all of us that he can play in the NHL last year. He played center most of his career. Those are two options. What I like about our group right now is we have good depth at forward. How the lines shake out, we’ll see. That’ll be up to the coaches, we’ll see what works and what doesn’t and we’ll be open-minded about it. We’re still coming back with a pretty good veteran group with Parise and Koivu, Pominville, Heatley, Setoguchi, Brodziak and even Mitchell. You look at our top-10 forwards, we have seven returning veteran forwards that are all good people and good players. And then we have a lot of young guys. The good thing for us is not every young guy has to make our team. That’s always the risk with young players, are they ready to play or not. Certainly there’s going to be competition there. They’re all on two-ways. Whoever can make it can make it. If a guy isn’t ready, we can get him down. So I really like the mix of veteran players and young players we have up front, and I like our depth up front. How it all works out will be the question mark for training camp. But since Ive been here, this is the deepest our group has been. There’s a lot of talent up front. We’ll have to sort it out and reserve the right to make an adjustment later in if we need to. I think there’s some danger in overreacting right now to what we perceive might be an area that isn’t as strong as other areas (i.e. second-line center). … It’s a solid team right now. I’m excited for training camp to see what we have with our young players in particular.
Too much depending on the kids? We’ve all seen it, not every young kid hits their high side, but we’ve got enough of them now we’re some of them are going to hit their high side, and that’s the exciting part to see where they’re at.
Now in a few days or so, if some guys don’t have jobs and you could get on a bargain, could you do it? Yeah, we could. We could. I think after this day gets through, there’s going to be not nearly as much dollars that teams can spend and there are still going to be some players left over. There may be some value type of signings that we can look at as the summer goes on. … I think the summer will be a relatively active one. I think teams will be looking to make adjustments and I think there will be players looking for deals. We’ll see how it all plays out. I’m certainly comfortable starting the season where we are and we’ll see how things play out.
Ballard you pounced on real quick. Did you target him? Absolutely. It’s no secret we don’t have a lot of cap space and what we wanted to do was to try to find a player that we could sign to a favorable cap number that had a reasonable opportunity to exceed the value of his contract, if that makes sense. We knew there were a lot of No. 6 and 7 type of defensemen that we could sign for the dollars that we had available, but we wanted to maximize the upside potential of the signing. And when you look at Keith, he’s played 550 games in his career, our defense is relatively young and to have an experienced guy that has played that many games in the league was attractive. He’s a mobile guy that can also complete, and often times you have to make a choice between mobility and competitiveness, and this is a guy that brings both dimensions to the team. He can play left side or right side, he can move the puck and he’s had some very good seasons in this league and he’s coming off a couple seasons in Vancouver that didn’t go the way he wanted them to. We obviously believe he’s better, that he can play at a higher level than he did the last few years, and I think he feels that way. I really think Rick Wilson will help him get back to his game, and if he does, I think we got terrific value in that signing. It just made too much sense, and I give Keith credit, we presented our scenario, and told him what we had. He didn’t want to shop. He wanted to come. I think he likes the opportunity to play here and come back home, but he also looked at our depth chart and felt that he had a chance to play some meaningful minutes. We’re excited about it. It wouldn’t have worked without Keith buying into what we presented.
On Spurgeon’s 2.66M per contract: I think it’s a steal. Young guy, 21, 22 minutes a game, plus-player. I think Spurgeon’s battle his whole career, but even when he achieves and plays really well, people still question him because of his size. 2.66 number, I don’t know how we ever get in trouble with that. He’s a guy that can play power play, penalty kill, he moves the puck, he produces, he defends well. I think as we’re seeing today, the prices on 4, 5, 6 defensemen have far surpassed the dollars that we committed to Jared, so I feel very comfortable with it. He’s a good player. If you just look at his statistics by themselves and how he’s played, I think we could argue we got pretty good value. But I hope people keep questioning him. He’s a highly motivated player to begin with, but my guess is his next contract will even be more than this one.
On letting Cullen go: It was really tough. I spoke to him again today and a few times the last few weeks. He was well aware of our situation. First of all, he’s a great person. You look at all the work that he and his wife have done, not only in the Twin Cities, but Moorhead, and they’re tireless workers for charitable causes. He’s been a good teammate, he’s a hard-working guy, he’s a good hockey player and he’s a pro. It’s hard to replace guys like that. I have a lot of respect for him on and off the ice, but it is what it is. Fortunately, we have good depth up front. That’s not to say you easily replace Matt Cullen. I’m not implying that. But I do think we have enough depth up front to have a good lineup next year, and we’ll have to see how we fill that center spot and how that plays out. It is what it is. The cap decreased by a lot and we spent to the cap that year and we had to come back a long way to get cap compliant. Next year we should have a lot of cap space again. This is sort of a one-year pullback for a lot of teams, not just us. We’re not the only team. Next year we’ll have the opportunity to be more aggressive than we were this year, but fortunately we have a lot of good young players. Hopefully a couple of them step up and take advantage of the increased opportunity. That will be what training camp will be about. I’m excited to see what we have. ... I'm exciting for Bouchard too. That's a good price for the Islanders, and I wouldn't want to face that power play.


Left wing Center Right wing

Zach Parise ($7.5+M) Mikko Koivu (6.75M) **Jason Pominville (4.505M)

*Jason Zucker ($833,333) *Charlie Coyle (975K) Devin Setoguchi (3M)

*Nino Niederreiter (2.795M) Kyle Brodziak (2.83+M) Dany Heatley (7.5M)

Mike Rupp (1.5M) Zenon Konopka (925K) Torrey Mitchell (1.9M)

Extra: Jake Dowell (700K)

Unrestricted free agents: Matt Cullen (won’t be back) and Pierre-Marc Bouchard (won’t be back).
Some vying for spots: *Mikael Granlund, Justin Fontaine (RFA), Stephane Veilleux, *Erik Haula, *Brett Bulmer, *Zack Phillips.
* Two-way contract; can be sent to the minors without waivers.
**Buffalo picking up roughing $795,000


Left Defense Right Defense

Ryan Suter (7.5+M) Jonas Brodin (1.4+M)

Marco Scandella (1.025M) Keith Ballard (1.5M

Clayton Stoner (1.05M) Jared Spurgeon (2.66M)

Extra: Nate Prosser (825,000)

Vying for spots: Matt Dumba (can’t play in Iowa), Steve Kampfer, Kyle Medvec (RFA)
Unrestricted free agent: Brett Clark (won’t be back)


Niklas Backstrom (3.42M)
Josh Harding (1.9M)

Buyout charge

Mark Parrish ($927,778)

Total cap hit roughly: $63,253,868(includes Buffalo picking up Pominville’s portion)
Wild’s approximate cap ceiling next year (roughly $400,000 less than NHL): $63.9M
***Available space roughly: $646,132. This doesn't include others making the team. For instance, if Granlund makes it, his cap hit is $2.1 million. Remember also, the Wild needs to save at least $1 million of space for in-season injury callups.
***Cap hits for all Minnesota’s entry-level players inflated for potential bonuses (for example, Niederreiter’s salary is actually $810,000); teams can exceed the cap by 7.5% on potential performance bonuses, so Wild actually has more cap space than listed.


Houston 2 FINAL
St. Louis 5
Washington 9 FINAL
Atlanta 8
Miami 5 FINAL
Boston 3
Minnesota 1 FINAL
Tampa Bay 2
NY Yankees 4 FINAL
Philadelphia 1
Baltimore 4 FINAL
Toronto 5
Detroit - LP: J. Mantiply 4 FINAL
NY Mets - WP: C. Torres 5
Cincinnati 5 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 2
Los Angeles 10 FINAL
Milwaukee 1
San Francisco 12 FINAL
Texas 3
Chicago WSox 0 FINAL
San Diego 5
Kansas City 11 FINAL
Cleveland 9
Seattle 4 FINAL
Los Angeles 7
Colorado 0 FINAL
LA Angels 3
Oakland 7 FINAL
Arizona 2
Pittsburgh 3 Bottom 7th Inning
NY Yankees 0
Chicago 80 4th Qtr 2:01
Indiana 92
Sacramento 107 4th Qtr 1:13
Orlando 110
Utah 81 4th Qtr 3:05
Philadelphia 69
Miami 95 4th Qtr 1:25
Washington 98
Toronto 94 FINAL
Charlotte 103
Cleveland 72 3rd Qtr 3:50
Atlanta 73
Boston 52 3rd Qtr 9:22
New Orleans 52
Detroit 46 3rd Qtr
Houston 54
LA Lakers 55 3rd Qtr 9:15
Memphis 47
Phoenix 50 3rd Qtr
Brooklyn 46
Denver 44 2nd Qtr 6:54
San Antonio 44
Dallas 9:30 PM
Golden State
Columbus 3 3rd Prd 8:45
New Jersey 2
Minnesota 3 3rd Prd 4:59
Carolina 1
Buffalo 2 3rd Prd
Ottawa 1
Calgary 3 3rd Prd
Detroit 2
Edmonton 1 2nd Prd
Chicago 0
Pittsburgh 9:00 PM
Longwood 68 FINAL
Char Southern 60
Ark-Pine Bluff 94 FINAL
Miss Valley St 75
Southern Ill 45 FINAL
Wichita State 56
Winthrop 67 FINAL
Radford 66
Evansville 67 FINAL
Illinois State 71
Towson 69 FINAL
Elon 74
Gardner-Webb 72 FINAL
High Point 71
Samford 76 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 81
Northern Ill 57 1st OT 4:30
Ball State 59
Bowling Green 75 2nd Half 0:01
Buffalo 77
Brown 69 FINAL
Dartmouth 75
Toledo 59 FINAL
Eastern Mich 85
Akron 77 FINAL
Kent State 79
Ill-Chicago 72 FINAL
Oakland 69
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Ohio 95
Columbia 46 FINAL
Penn 54
Cornell 53 FINAL
Princeton 66
Central Mich 62 FINAL
Western Mich 74
Bradley 46 FINAL
Northern Iowa 71
Morehead State 67 2nd Half 7:09
Murray State 60
Yale 35 2nd Half 12:49
Harvard 26
Furman 38 1st Half 0:51
Citadel 26
Coll of Charleston 10 1st Half 6:41
Drexel 19
UNC-Asheville 22 1st Half 7:40
Coastal Carolina 18
Texas Tech 12 1st Half 15:06
Baylor 9
Pacific 14 1st Half 11:13
San Francisco 12
Detroit 8:30 PM
Cleveland State
Loyola-Chicago 8:35 PM
Indiana State
Belmont 9:00 PM
Eastern Ky
Loyola Marymount 10:30 PM
Santa Clara
Chicago 9:00 PM
Los Angeles
Saint Louis 63 FINAL
(21) George Washington 77
Wake Forest 68 FINAL
(16) Duke 77
Furman 55 FINAL
(17) Chattanooga 68
Monmouth 61 FINAL
Quinnipiac 82
Michigan State 60 FINAL
(4) Maryland 70
Belmont 65 FINAL
UT Martin 71
Arkansas 36 FINAL
(3) South Carolina 58
Mercer 56 FINAL
East Tenn St 66
Richmond 45 FINAL
Fordham 46
Miami-Florida 61 FINAL
(2) Notre Dame 77
Siena 61 FINAL
Iona 71
Washington St 48 FINAL
(9) Arizona State 67
Ark-Pine Bluff 63 FINAL
Miss Valley St 51
(23) Rutgers 57 FINAL
(24) Northwestern 62
Tennessee St 71 FINAL
SIU-Edwardsville 59
Loyola Marymount 50 FINAL
Gonzaga 70
(18) Texas A&M 65 FINAL
LSU 71
Cincinnati 76 FINAL
UCF 66
Saint Josephs 61 FINAL
Dayton 80
(19) Stanford 67
Santa Clara 42 FINAL
San Diego 51
Virginia Tech 43 FINAL
(7) Florida State 82
Memphis 71
Lehigh 75 FINAL
Holy Cross 62
Rhode Island 53 FINAL
Duquesne 66
North Florida 35 FINAL
(20) Fla Gulf Coast 74
Kennesaw St 54 FINAL
Jacksonville 55
USC Upstate 45 FINAL
Northern Ky 64
Lipscomb 69 FINAL
Stetson 92
Nebraska 65 FINAL
(14) Iowa 74
Saint Peters 57 FINAL
Marist 62
Navy 60 FINAL
Bucknell 49
Lafayette 56 FINAL
American Univ 79
Colgate 45 FINAL
Army 48
Georgia 41 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 75
Dartmouth 71 FINAL
Brown 53
Penn 50 FINAL
Columbia 34
(13) Princeton 70 FINAL
Cornell 37
Kansas 49 FINAL
Kansas State 57
Harvard 68 FINAL
Yale 63
(15) North Carolina 30 2nd Half
(10) Louisville 31
San Jose St 68 2nd Half 14:41
Houston 13 1st Half 3:15
Tulane 24
Utah State 12 1st Half 15:53
Colorado State 11
Colorado 18 1st Half 13:11
(8) Oregon State 12
New Mexico 6 1st Half 13:06
Wyoming 7
Minnesota 8:25 PM
Ohio State
(12) Kentucky 8:25 PM
(11) Miss State
San Diego State 8:30 PM
Niagara 8:30 PM
Texas Tech 8:30 PM
West Virginia
Boise State 9:00 PM
Fresno State
Washington 10:30 PM
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters





question of the day

Poll: Who is doing the best job coaching a Minnesota pro sports team?

Weekly Question