Schafer: Stadium’s bond sale generated purple buzz

  • Article by: LEE SCHAFER , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 19, 2014 - 9:34 PM
hide

A sample of the bond certificate for the new Vikings stadium.

If you think the municipal bond business only gets exciting when a big issue goes into default, you need to know about the People’s Stadium bonds.

In truth, they are nothing more than generic-sounding state general-fund appropriation bonds. But RBC Capital Markets of Minneapolis managed to create a little marketing buzz around a Minnesota Vikings purple certificate of ownership for some of them.

The certificates go to buyers this week, wrapping up the bond sale that will help finance the stadium project now underway in downtown Minneapolis.

In a business that doesn’t have a lot of room for marketing creativity, doing anything remotely clever is remarkable enough. But the people’s bonds idea also shows why locals should get hired to sell this kind of financing, as no New Yorker would have come up with it. And no New Yorker can match the locals’ ability to place bonds with Minnesotans.

It was Cory Hoeppner, a public finance investment banker who has been with RBC Capital Markets since February 2008, who proposed a People’s Stadium bond as RBC competed to be lead underwriter.

He explained that he first test-marketed his idea inside RBC. What he was really hoping to do was to capture a little of the finance magic that happens across the river with fans of the Green Bay Packers.

There usually isn’t much a Vikings fan can envy when looking into Packers territory other than the Packers’ ownership structure and maybe the team’s peerless quarterback. The Packers get a great deal of local support just by having the NFL franchise owned by thousands of folks living in the community rather than a handful of out-of-state real estate deal guys.

In the recent past, Green Bay Packers Inc. easily raised enough through a common stock sale to fund renovations to the team’s stadium, despite plain-language warnings of the stock’s essential worthlessness as an investment.

As a line from the Packers’ 2011 offering document put it, “It is virtually impossible for anyone to realize a profit on a purchase of common stock or even to recoup the amount initially paid to acquire such common stock.”

The deal sold so well that the team bumped up the total shares offered.

But what Hoeppner was looking at was selling a real investment, a genuine, AA-rated State of Minnesota bond, and he needed a way to emphasize its connection to the Vikings.

RBC can’t even sell an actual bond, of course, if that term means a paper document that the granddaughter of an investor can one day pull from a safe-deposit box and hold in her hands.

It’s long been the case that bonds are “book entry.” Buy some bonds, and some computers whir and blink for a nanosecond and evidence of the bonds’ ownership shows up in a brokerage account.

That’s not any fun.

What the RBC team came up with was a certificate of ownership, with a big Vikings logo right in the middle. In the lower left-hand corner it says, in type that is not particularly fine, that it’s nothing but a commemorative document and not evidence of an investment at all.

RBC made the certificates available only to its clients. It held a reception and had its bond trading desk that is dedicated to small investors regularly communicating with other RBC offices. More importantly, RBC did what it could to make the bonds more appealing to Vikings fans.

Bond issues are usually sold as a series of bonds, and in this deal the first bonds mature in June 2015, the last ones in 2033. The first 4 percent yield maturity, as it turned out, was 2033. Those are the bonds they picked for commemoration.

It’s also typical in the bond business to have an interest rate of, say, 4 percent, sold to provide a return that isn’t precisely 4 percent. That means that bonds can sell at either a premium, more than 100 cents on the dollar, or at a discount.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Chicago Cubs - WP: B. Parker 6 FINAL
Cincinnati - LP: J. Hoover 4
Philadelphia - WP: D. Buchanan 9 FINAL
Milwaukee - LP: M. Garza 1
Oakland - WP: S. Kazmir 6 FINAL
San Francisco - LP: T. Hudson 1
Chicago WSox - LP: R. Belisario 3 FINAL
Boston - WP: A. Miller 4
Washington - LP: G. Gonzalez 3 FINAL
Baltimore - WP: W. Chen 4
NY Yankees - LP: M. Thornton 3 FINAL
Cleveland - WP: C. Carrasco 9
Atlanta - WP: A. Harang 3 FINAL
NY Mets - LP: B. Colon 1
Pittsburgh - WP: E. Volquez 9 FINAL
St. Louis - LP: S. Miller 1
LA Angels - WP: H. Santiago 15 FINAL
Texas - LP: C. Lewis 6
Detroit - WP: D. Smyly 16 FINAL
Kansas City - LP: J. Guthrie 4
San Diego 1 Top 9th Inning
Los Angeles 2
Minnesota 4 Bottom 7th Inning
Seattle 1
Winnipeg 7/11/14 6:00 PM
Montreal
Ottawa 7/11/14 9:00 PM
Edmonton
Calgary 7/12/14 5:30 PM
Toronto
Brt Columbia 7/12/14 8:30 PM
Saskatchewan
Edmonton 7/17/14 7:30 PM
Winnipeg
Toronto 7/18/14 6:00 PM
Ottawa
Hamilton 7/18/14 9:00 PM
Calgary
Montreal 7/19/14 6:00 PM
Brt Columbia
Connecticut 68 FINAL
Indiana 72
Minnesota 91 FINAL
Tulsa 85
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pm
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pm
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pm
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pm
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis Noon
Sep 14 - vs. New England Noon
Sep 21 - at New Orleans Noon
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pm
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pm
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit Noon
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo Noon
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay Noon
Nov 2 - vs. Washington Noon
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago Noon
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay Noon
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina Noon
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets Noon
Dec 14 - at Detroit Noon
Dec 21 - at Miami Noon
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago Noon

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Which local pro team are you most excited about?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close