Frazier on Vikings' QB situaton with Freeman: 'Hindsight is 20-20'

  • Article by: MARK CRAIG , Star Tribune
  • Updated: December 22, 2013 - 8:21 AM

The in-season signing of Josh Freeman was hailed as a bold move – before he quickly became an afterthought.

The Vikings and the Panthers were 1-3 when Graham Gano launched the opening kickoff at noon Oct. 13 at Mall of America Field. Leslie Frazier and Ron Rivera — rival head coaches, longtime friends and former Super Bowl teammates — stood on opposite sidelines as popular picks for those trendy early-season NFL hot seats. ¶ By 3:05 p.m., they had shaken hands at midfield and gone their separate ways. Ten weeks later, Rivera is 10-4, a Coach of the Year candidate and one awfully thankful boss of Cam Newton, a 24-year-old undisputed franchise quarterback who has entrenched himself in Carolina in his third season. ¶ Frazier, meanwhile, is 4-9-1, still in danger of being fired and the unfortunate caretaker of an unstable quarterback situation whose resolution could go in any number of different directions after the season concludes a week from Sunday.

The Panthers left Mall of America Field with a 35-10 victory and the highest passer rating (143.4) of Newton’s career. Their approach to Newton’s third straight 1-3 start had been simple: Just stay patient. Newton, after all, was a former No. 1 overall draft pick with individual success and off-the-charts athleticism. He is often what you get the spring after a 2-14 fall.

The Vikings, meanwhile, retreated to Winter Park, baffled by a blowout they never saw coming and a quarterback letdown that felt all too familiar since Christian Ponder was selected 12th overall in 2011. Having already turned from Ponder to Matt Cassel in what was becoming a lost season, Frazier and offensive coordinator Bill Musgrave began devising a Plan C that would surprise not only the Giants and the rest of the league but their own locker room as well. They would up the ante on General Manger Rick Spielman’s already-aggressive move to sign former Buccaneers quarterback Josh Freeman the week before. In what certainly qualified as desperate times, they would start Freeman on the road against the Giants on a Monday night. And they would do it with Freeman having practiced only four times with the first-team offense.

“The way he prepared, not only that week but the week prior to his start, we really felt he had a grasp of where we were with our offense,” said Frazier, who confirmed again that he has final say on all decisions involving starts and playing time. “His arm strength. Very impressive. He has a big arm, can make every throw. What we saw on tape in Tampa Bay prior to him signing with us. All that was a part of it.”

Far fewer critics questioned Frazier’s decision before kickoff. Cassel, after all, had just played poorly in the 25-point loss to Carolina, and Ponder started the year 0-3.

Things changed quickly, however, as Freeman and the Vikings began embarrassing themselves in front of the nation.

With shocking inaccuracy (37.7 percent) and an illogical game plan that resulted in what’s still a team season-high 53 passes and just 14 runs, the Vikings offense failed to score in a 23-7 loss.

“Hindsight,” said Frazier, “is 20-20.”

As the Freeman fiasco fades, people haven’t questioned why he started a game after signing in midseason as much as they’ve wondered why he hasn’t played since. Ponder started the next six games, while Cassel has started the past two and heads into Sunday’s game at Cincinnati fresh off a 382-yard performance in a 48-30 upset of the Eagles.

Frazier was asked again Wednesday if Freeman might play in the final two weeks of the season. He managed a smile and some gallows humor in the face of what’s been a three-headed albatross threatening his survival as a head coach.

“You guys might not believe this,” Frazier told reporters, “but I don’t like juggling quarterbacks.”

Staying aggressive

We know what the Freeman signing didn’t produce, which was the immense improbability of any quarterback arriving on Oct. 6, learning an NFL offense on the fly, developing rhythm with complete strangers and stepping in as a successful starter this season.

But what has it produced? Or, better yet, what were some of the more realistic objectives behind the decision to give Freeman $2 million for 12 games?

First, the Vikings got 12 weeks to exclusively interact with and evaluate the soon-to-be free agent on how he practices, studies and relates to teammates and coaches on the field, in meetings and the locker room. That was a high priority considering Freeman’s ugly divorce from the Bucs and the potential interest the Vikings may have in signing him long-term for more money this offseason.

Second, the Freeman signing was designed to try to pressure Ponder into finding a way to achieve the consistency he’s lacked his entire career. Although Ponder once again responded with some promising moments — he played consistently well in the win over Washington and would have beaten the Packers in Green Bay if not for three key drops late in regulation and overtime — ultimately it was the veteran Cassel who rose to the top when the competition heated up in practice.

Finally, not only did the Freeman signing not cost the Vikings a draft pick, it ultimately could bring a compensatory pick in 2015 if Freeman and the Vikings part ways after this season. Spielman’s stockpiling of picks in recent years has resulted in the Vikings selecting five players in the first round the past two years. Four of them — Matt Kalil, Harrison Smith, Xavier Rhodes and Cordarrelle Patterson — are starters, while the other — Sharrif Floyd — is a projected starter next season.

Spielman admitted last month that he’s not satisfied with the quarterback position and that all avenues, including a dip back into the draft for the second time in four years, are open to his ongoing search.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Detroit 69 FINAL
Philadelphia 89
Portland 94 FINAL
Cleveland 99
Sacramento 102 FINAL
Toronto 119
Boston 98 FINAL
Minnesota 110
Dallas 94 FINAL
Houston 99
Denver 93 FINAL
New Orleans 85
Brooklyn 102 FINAL
Atlanta 113
Oklahoma City 92 FINAL
New York 100
Charlotte 86 FINAL
San Antonio 95
LA Clippers 94 FINAL
Utah 89
Washington 98 FINAL
Phoenix 106
Toronto 1 FINAL(SO)
New Jersey 2
Pittsburgh 0 FINAL
Washington 4
Chicago 3 FINAL
Los Angeles 4
Temple 86 FINAL
UCF 62
Winthrop 75 FINAL
Coastal Carolina 68
Lafayette 59 FINAL
Colgate 54
Northeastern 60 FINAL
Drexel 65
Wake Forest 76 FINAL
Florida State 82
Rhode Island 64 FINAL
Fordham 63
Delaware 82 FINAL
James Madison 88
South Carolina 58 FINAL
LSU 64
New Hampshire 63 FINAL
Maine 58
Seton Hall 80 FINAL
Marquette 70
Binghamton 68 FINAL
UMBC 56
American Univ 54 FINAL
Navy 64
Elon 65 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 82
Wright State 76 FINAL
Oakland 84
Minnesota 58 FINAL
Penn State 63
Duquesne 55 FINAL
Richmond 86
SMU 63 FINAL
South Florida 52
Hartford 66 FINAL
Stony Brook 72
Albany 47 FINAL
Vermont 44
Hofstra 79 FINAL
William & Mary 100
UNC-Asheville 74 FINAL
Longwood 64
Radford 84 FINAL
Char Southern 77
Holy Cross 0 Postponed
Loyola-Maryland 0
Duke 73 FINAL
Notre Dame 77
Texas Tech 36 FINAL
Oklahoma 81
Oregon State 55 FINAL
Arizona State 73
Morehead State 82 FINAL
Austin Peay 69
Drake 69 FINAL
Bradley 57
Lehigh 62 FINAL
Bucknell 68
Rice 48 FINAL
Houston 59
Missouri State 57 FINAL
Illinois State 67
Loyola-Chicago 47 FINAL
Wichita State 58
Nebraska Omaha 64 FINAL
South Dakota St 86
Northern Iowa 59 FINAL
Southern Ill 52
Louisville 81 FINAL
Boston College 72
St Johns 74 FINAL
Creighton 77
East Carolina 58 FINAL
Memphis 70
Georgia Tech 70 FINAL
Miami-Florida 50
Miss State 73 FINAL
Ole Miss 79
Clemson 68 FINAL
NC State 57
Indiana 67 FINAL
Purdue 83
Kansas 64 FINAL
TCU 61
Oregon 56 FINAL
Arizona 90
Air Force 66 FINAL
San Jose St 52
Stanford 84 FINAL
Washington 74
Rider 56 FINAL
Siena 49
Dayton 76 FINAL
Richmond 62
Eastern Kentucky 53 FINAL
Jacksonville St 73
Saint Josephs 0 Postponed
Saint Louis 0
UMBC 71 FINAL
Binghamton 55
Akron 60 FINAL
Ohio U 72
Ball State 72 FINAL
Miami-Ohio 55
Memphis 56 FINAL
Cincinnati 44
East Carolina 32 FINAL
(2) Connecticut 87
Murray State 59 FINAL
Eastern Illinois 75
Kent State 63 FINAL
Central Michigan 65
UT Martin 64 FINAL
Tennessee St 58
Eastern Michigan 56 FINAL
Western Mich 83
Bucknell 61 FINAL
Lehigh 76
Indiana 57 FINAL
Michigan State 72
Colgate 56 FINAL
Lafayette 58
Fordham 66 FINAL
Davidson 45
Duquesne 76 FINAL
St Bonaventure 64
George Mason 66 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 70
Detroit 59 FINAL
Youngstown St 58
Army 0 Postponed
Boston U 0
Loyola-Maryland 0 Postponed
Holy Cross 0
SMU 58 FINAL
Tulsa 74
Oklahoma St 54 FINAL
Kansas State 52
West Virginia 57 FINAL
Texas Tech 73
Denver 56 FINAL
South Dakota 82
Northwestern St 46 FINAL
Central Arkansas 63
Austin Peay 67 FINAL
SIU-Edwardsville 87
Kansas 61 FINAL
Iowa State 56
Bowling Green 50 FINAL
Northern Ill 67
Penn State 64 FINAL
Minnesota 75
San Jose St 80 FINAL
Air Force 83
Boise State 82 FINAL
Colorado State 83
Utah State 51 FINAL
Wyoming 86
San Diego State 50 FINAL
Fresno State 57
Nevada 52 FINAL
UNLV 75
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pmX10-6
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pmX30-28
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pmX30-12
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pmX19-3
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis NoonX34-6
Sep 14 - vs. New England NoonX30-7
Sep 21 - at New Orleans NoonX20-9
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pmX41-28
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pmX42-10
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit NoonX17-3
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo NoonX17-16
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay NoonX19-13 ot
Nov 2 - vs. Washington NoonX29-26
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago NoonX21-13
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay NoonX24-21
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina NoonX31-13
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets NoonX30-24 ot
Dec 14 - at Detroit 3:25 pmX16-14
Dec 21 - at Miami NoonX37-35
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago NoonX13-9

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Who will win the Super Bowl?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close