Two unrealistic and entirely theoretical football-based conversations have hovered around Adrian Peterson this season, flitting from Twitter timeline to talk show.
The first, which became popular with Vikings fans this summer, asked whether Peterson could rush for 2,500 yards this season.
The second, prompted by the nature of the NFL and renewed by the Vikings’ offensive failures, asks whether the Vikings should trade Peterson for a quarterback.
Like alien spaceship sightings and sasquatch rumors, there is enough raw logic and circumstantial evidence surrounding the questions to make them sound legitimate, even if both are as improbable as an alien sasquatch cooking you dinner tonight.
The first question has been rendered rhetorical by the stunning failure of the Vikings’ offensive line to open holes against stacked defensive fronts, one season after the line did exactly that while enabling Peterson’s 2,097 rushing yards in 2012.
The second question becomes more logical every week.
Should the Vikings trade Peterson for a quarterback?
Yes. But they won’t.
In the purely theoretical world in which the Yankees and Red Sox should have swapped Joe DiMaggio and Ted Williams, to allow each to hit in a ballpark more suited to their swings, the Vikings should trade Peterson for an elite quarterback.
Here’s the problem: It’s a good idea for the Vikings because it would be a bad idea for any trade partner. As great as Peterson is, no intelligent NFL general manager would trade an elite quarterback for a running back, even the greatest running back of a generation.
And even if the Vikings could get someone to stay on the phone for five seconds to listen to their pitch, Peterson has less trade value than he’s ever had.
What made Peterson’s MVP season so surprising was his ability to beat defenses dedicated to stopping him, ones that saw no number other than 28 when they practiced all week.
Monday night, Peterson’s season of frustration reached its lowest valley. Facing a poor defense on a national stage, he managed 9 rushing yards on eight carries in the first half and 28 for the game.
Peterson prides himself on a “Famine, famine, feast’’ philosophy, meaning he’s learned to accept that negative plays, with patience and determination, will lead to big plays.
Instead, Peterson’s season has reversed his saying. It’s been “Feast, famine, famine.’’ He took the first handoff of the season 78 yards for a touchdown. Since then, he has averaged 3.8 yards per carry, a shocking number for a back who often creates his own space by breaking tackles and bouncing runs away from designed paths.
The Vikings’ unsightly passing offense could be blamed, if Peterson hadn’t thrived regardless of the state of the passing game last year.
The Vikings’ coaching staff could be blamed, but these coaches were all in place last year.
So what’s changed?