Rand: Don't count on Fitzgerald in purple

  • Updated: December 11, 2012 - 9:18 PM

Trading for Larry Fitzgerald Jr. would be fabulous, but highly problematic.

hide

Cardinals wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald Jr.

Photo: Matt York, Associated Press

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The latest fixation of the Vikings fans is Larry Fitzgerald Jr., who happens to be playing with a crew of awful QBs in Arizona and -- at least inwardly -- can't be happy about how it is impacting his production.

He's the receiver we need! He's one of us! He used to be a ballboy for the Vikes! Let's get him in purple!

The idea of trying to complete an offseason trade for Fitzgerald, in principle, isn't without merit. He's a Hall of Fame talent, he is only 29 and he would give a listless passing attack instant juice.

But before you get too excited about the notion, we are going to quickly throw some cold water on it. Here are two reasons why it almost certainly will not happen:

1. Fitzgerald is incredibly expensive. He signed an eight-year extension last year that included a ton of guaranteed money. According to Spotrac.com, his cap hit every year between 2014 and 2017 is at least $17 million. Now, by itself, that's not a deal-breaker. There are ways to restructure things when new situations present themselves. The problem is teams very rarely pay two wide receivers huge money.

That brings us to Percy Harvin. Before his injury, the Vikings at least had a functional passing game. Without Harvin, they do not. And Harvin is looking to get paid. So if the Vikings were paying Fitzgerald huge money, they would either have to devote massive amounts of salary to both receivers or jettison Harvin. The former leaves little room for other roster moves (such as, perhaps, thinking about bringing in a veteran QB to challenge for the starting spot); the latter makes you ask how much better the passing game would really be with Fitzgerald but without Harvin.

2. Even if the money issue could be figured out, acquiring Fitzgerald almost certainly would require the Vikings to give up a boatload of draft picks -- which would go against everything GM Rick Spielman has preached when it comes to rebuilding this team. A massive trade like that would solve one big problem while potentially creating several other smaller but pesky roster holes.

In other words, it would be a tempting shortcut, but one that is highly unrealistic.

MICHAEL RAND

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Chicago WSox - WP: S. Carroll 6 FINAL
Cleveland - LP: Z. McAllister 2
Atlanta - WP: M. Minor 11 FINAL
Chicago Cubs - LP: E. Jackson 6
NY Yankees - WP: S. Greene 3 FINAL
Baltimore - LP: C. Tillman 0
Arizona - WP: W. Miley 2 FINAL
San Francisco - LP: R. Vogelsong 0
St. Louis - WP: A. Wainwright 10 FINAL
Milwaukee - LP: J. Nelson 2
Miami - LP: M. Dunn 4 FINAL
NY Mets - WP: V. Black 5
Boston - LP: J. Peavy 2 FINAL
Houston - WP: J. Fields 3
Minnesota - WP: K. Correia 9 FINAL
Colorado - LP: T. Matzek 3
Toronto - LP: D. Hutchison 3 FINAL
Tampa Bay - WP: J. Odorizzi 10
Detroit - WP: R. Porcello 5 FINAL
Kansas City - LP: J. Shields 1
Washington - WP: R. Detwiler 5 FINAL
Philadelphia - LP: J. Diekman 3
Pittsburgh - WP: J. Wilson 6 FINAL
Cincinnati - LP: J. Hoover 5
LA Angels - WP: J. Weaver 5 FINAL
Texas - LP: M. Mikolas 2
San Diego - LP: K. Quackenbush 0 FINAL
Los Angeles - WP: K. Jansen 1
Oakland - LP: J. Chavez 2 FINAL
Seattle - WP: H. Iwakuma 6
Colorado 3 FINAL
Philadelphia 3
Houston 2 FINAL
Toronto FC 4
Columbus 1 FINAL
Red Bull New York 4
Chicago 1 FINAL
New England 0
Sporting Kansas City 2 FINAL
Montreal 1
Chivas USA 3 FINAL
Vancouver FC 1
Real Salt Lake 0 FINAL
Los Angeles 1
Winnipeg 34 FINAL
Montreal 33
Ottawa 11 FINAL
Edmonton 27
Calgary 34 FINAL
Toronto 15
Brt Columbia 26 FINAL
Saskatchewan 13
Atlanta 93 FINAL
Indiana 74
Washington 91 FINAL
Tulsa 74
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pm
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pm
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pm
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pm
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis Noon
Sep 14 - vs. New England Noon
Sep 21 - at New Orleans Noon
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pm
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pm
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit Noon
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo Noon
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay Noon
Nov 2 - vs. Washington Noon
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago Noon
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay Noon
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina Noon
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets Noon
Dec 14 - at Detroit Noon
Dec 21 - at Miami Noon
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago Noon

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Which local pro team are you most excited about?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close