Stadium could get House, Senate votes this weekend

  • Article by: MIKE KASZUBA and RACHEL E. STASSEN-BERGER , Star Tribune
  • Updated: April 28, 2012 - 7:32 AM

A bruising hearing and a 7-6 vote set stage for a weekend showdown.

The Minnesota Vikings' quest for a new stadium barely survived its most difficult test Friday, when a key Senate panel narrowly voted to push the project ahead. That sets up what could be a ferocious fight for votes in the full House and Senate.

The Senate Taxes Committee voted 7-6 to move the bill ahead, but the Vikings got a vivid preview of how difficult it will be to win final approval for a $1 billion stadium. Some Republicans teamed with DFL stadium opponents during the long, bruising hearing.

Senate Majority Leader David Senjem, R-Rochester, said afterward that the full Senate may vote on the bill Sunday, with a House floor vote coming as early as Saturday. "We've got to soak this up a little bit," Senjem said.

Senjem noted that the stadium project could move ahead in the Senate even without an overall end-of-session agreement on a range of other issues that include taxes and bonding.

The stadium proposal has passed six House and Senate panels in the past month, but its path continues to be uncertain. Nearly all the votes have been without recommendation and many have come on simple voice votes that allowed legislators to skip going on record with their individual positions.

"I knew this was a tough committee. They vetted it through pretty well, they hopefully got it off their chest and we'll move to the floor," said Sen. Julie Rosen, R-Fairmont, the bill's chief Senate stadium author after the marathon six-hour hearing. Rosen said she believes the bill will pass the full Senate.

Funding still a sticking point

The stadium's biggest hurdle might be a last-minute proposal to rely on user fees rather than money from electronic pulltabs and bingo in bars and restaurants as a means of paying the state's $398 million share. The idea, adopted at one point by the panel and later dropped after a series of abrupt political maneuvers, still has supporters.

"I do think this is the heart of the question Minnesotans are asking," said Sen. Julianne Ortman, R-Chanhassen, the Senate Taxes Committee chair, referring to whether the stadium could be financed by user fees rather than expanded gambling.

But supporters of user fees said they needed more time to provide details of how high the fees would need to be. Sen. Geoff Michel, R-Edina, said swapping state revenue plans at such a late hour would likely scuttle the project.

"This really rips out the backbone" of the state's funding plan, Michel said of the user-fee proposal.

As a large and confused crowd watched the Senate panel's final moments, the committee recessed, putting the project in political jeopardy. It reconvened moments later and immediately adopted the stadium's public subsidy package without substantial changes.

Supporters gained another crucial victory when the panel tossed out a controversial plan to put video slot machines at the state's horse racing tracks as a means of funding the stadium. Rosen said that plan, known as racino, would sink the stadium bill. "Perhaps that is exactly what is intended," she said.

With time running short at the Capitol, Vikings officials sat glumly as legislative opponents spent hours intensely questioning what had been seen as relatively minor -- and, to some, generally accepted -- parts of the project's subsidy package.

In one surprising move, the Senate panel voted to deny a tax exemption for building materials and supplies and came within one vote of requiring the stadium to pay property taxes, even though the facility would be publicly owned. The exemptions are considered standard for publicly owned facilities.

"How many other public buildings in the state of Minnesota pay property taxes?" demanded a frustrated Sen. Rod Skoe, DFL-Clearbrook. "This would be the only one."

State officials and private financial experts have repeatedly assured lawmakers that the funding plan relying on electronic bingo and pulltabs is feasible, but some legislators doubt it. Sen. Gretchen Hoffman, R-Vergas, called the revenue estimates "fairy dust numbers."

Ortman said her own son has been asking whether she would support the project. "He's been working his mom," she said.

"The Vikings are an asset," Ortman told the panel. "They are an important part of the economy. But they ask us to do some extraordinary things on their behalf. We have thousands of businesses in the state of Minnesota that are struggling, [and] ordinarily it is not good tax policy to pick one business over another."

Mike Kaszuba • 651-222-1673

  • related content

  • Photo gallery: Legislative committee scrutinizes Vikings stadium

    Saturday April 28, 2012

    Legislative committee scrutinies Vikings stadium

  • Callers to Dayton: pro-stadium, split on fireworks

    Friday April 27, 2012

    The two issues have been the top two for callers to the governor's office in the last week

  • Stadium bill author Julie Rosen, R, Senate Minority Leader Thomas Bakk, DFL, and Senate Majority Leader David Senjem, R, had an animated meeting Friday night outside the hearing room during a break to figure out how to deal with the Racino amendment to her bill which was later defeated. Friday, April 27, 2012

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Minnesota 94 FINAL
Philadelphia 103
Houston 93 FINAL
Boston 87
Portland 99 FINAL
Atlanta 105
Sacramento 90 FINAL
Cleveland 101
Toronto 127 FINAL
Brooklyn 122
Dallas 93 FINAL
Miami 72
LA Clippers 103 FINAL
New Orleans 108
Golden State 100 FINAL
Utah 110
Chicago 55 3rd Qtr 6:17
Phoenix 62
Pittsburgh 2 FINAL(OT)
New Jersey 1
St. Louis 3 FINAL(SO)
Carolina 2
Nashville 0 FINAL
Colorado 3
Buffalo 2 3rd Prd 13:43
Vancouver 4
Chicago 3 3rd Prd 15:03
Anaheim 0
Harvard 75 FINAL
Princeton 72
Quinnipiac 57 FINAL
Canisius 63
Brown 49 FINAL
Cornell 57
Siena 79 FINAL
Manhattan 87
Marist 65 FINAL
Niagara 61
Dartmouth 51 FINAL
Penn 58
Oregon 68 FINAL
Arizona State 67
Yale 63 FINAL
Columbia 59
Monmouth 60 FINAL
Fairfield 59
IUPUI 59 FINAL
Western Ill 63
Oregon State 34 FINAL
Arizona 57
Kent State 55 FINAL
Buffalo 80
Canisius 75 FINAL
Monmouth 58
Butler 67 FINAL
Providence 59
Cornell 65 FINAL
Brown 52
Columbia 47 FINAL
Yale 55
Coll of Charleston 47 FINAL
Drexel 64
Penn 55 FINAL
Dartmouth 39
Elon 60 FINAL
James Madison 89
(19) Princeton 96 FINAL
Harvard 46
(9) Florida State 82 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Quinnipiac 87 FINAL
Siena 62
Richmond 54 FINAL
Rhode Island 50
Loyola-Chicago 58 FINAL
Southern Ill 64
Georgetown 52 FINAL
DePaul 93
Villanova 75 FINAL
Marquette 59
Wichita State 70 FINAL
Northern Iowa 51
Xavier 65 FINAL
Creighton 74
Bradley 58 FINAL
Illinois State 55
Missouri State 89 FINAL
Drake 94
Arizona 48 FINAL
Utah 62
(11) Arizona State 68 FINAL
Colorado 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pmX10-6
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pmX30-28
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pmX30-12
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pmX19-3
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis NoonX34-6
Sep 14 - vs. New England NoonX30-7
Sep 21 - at New Orleans NoonX20-9
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pmX41-28
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pmX42-10
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit NoonX17-3
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo NoonX17-16
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay NoonX19-13 ot
Nov 2 - vs. Washington NoonX29-26
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago NoonX21-13
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay NoonX24-21
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina NoonX31-13
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets NoonX30-24 ot
Dec 14 - at Detroit 3:25 pmX16-14
Dec 21 - at Miami NoonX37-35
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago NoonX13-9

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Who will win the Super Bowl?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close