Minneapolis residents split on footing bill for Vikings stadium

  • Article by: RICHARD MERYHEW , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 6, 2012 - 8:26 AM

The prospect of helping to pay the Vikings bill draws yes - enthusiastic! - and no - emphatic! - answers.


Patrons of a popular downtown bar and restaurant can see the Metrodome from windows along 5th Street S.

Photo: Jim Gehrz, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Jamal Hashi wants it, Kenny Herrman has doubts.

Season-ticket holder Phil Nelson prefers the well-worn Metrodome, but if a new stadium for the hometown Vikings must be built, he said, then Minneapolis voters should have a say in whether they pay.

"Majority rule, that's the right way to do it," said Nelson, 71, a longtime barber in south Minneapolis. "That's the American way, right?"

From Linden Hills to the tornado-battered blocks of the city's North Side, with a mix of anger, anticipation or a hint of resignation, Minneapolis residents are deep in debate and quite divided over whether the city should help pay for a $975 million downtown football stadium near the current Metrodome site.

Some, such as Hashi, a chef and restaurant owner at the Midtown Global Market, say they support city funding for a new stadium even if it means bypassing a voter referendum, a move advocated by Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak.

"I side with Rybak on that one," said Hashi, 30, a Somali immigrant who grew up in Minneapolis watching the Vikings with his family and friends. "There is no down side to it for the city or the state. It's something that brings people together. It's fun, so why the hell not?"

Others, such as Herrman, an 88-year-old North Side resident, adamantly oppose a city subsidy for a team and a league raking in millions.

"They can pay their own way as far as I'm concerned," he said over coffee one morning last week at Emily's Family Restaurant in north Minneapolis.

Still others, such as Nelson, say they are stuck "in middle ground," but don't want to risk losing the team to another city.

"I suppose what it really comes down to is what is best for the city?" he said.

Talk heats up

What's best for the Vikings and the city has been a hot topic at the Capitol and City Hall for months. But the debate intensified last week after Gov. Mark Dayton announced that the state, the city and the Vikings had struck a tentative deal for a $975 million stadium at the Metrodome site that could open as early as the 2016 season.

Terms call for the city to pay $150 million up front in construction costs. The state would pay $398 million and the Vikings would contribute $427 million. The city also would finance about $188 million in operating costs over the next 30 years.

The legislative hurdles are formidable, and approval is no certainty. Yet the key to the deal might well rest with the city and, possibly, its voters.

So far, seven of the 13 City Council members are on record opposing city funding without taking the issue to voters.

But Rybak has argued that, since the city money would come from state-authorized taxes, the deal could be approved without triggering a city charter provision requiring the city to hold a referendum on any sports facility costing it more than $10 million. Five years ago, Hennepin County won legislative approval to bypass a countywide vote on public subsidies for Target Field, the new home for the Minnesota Twins.

Some council members have said that without a citywide vote, the stadium deal could wind up in court. With it, Nelson and others say, it could well go down to defeat.

Council President Barb Johnson, who supports the project, said she and Rybak are working to win over a majority of council members to show legislators that Minneapolis supports the project.

"The state wants a sense of where we're at," heading into the legislative debate, she said.

Constituents, meanwhile, are speaking out online, at coffee shops and in pubs and barbershops across the city.

Johnson said she's received dozens of calls and e-mails on the issue in recent weeks, many in support of the stadium.

Council Member Don Samuels, who also favors the deal, said most of what he hears from outside the city is "supportive." But within the city, he said, reactions are "mixed."

As Herrman and several morning regulars groused about the deal over coffee at Emily's last week, Linda Kinde, a Northeast resident, first-grade teacher and diehard Dallas Cowboys fan, gushed over the prospect of a sparkling new downtown stadium.

Kinde, 60, said she'd rather see the cost of the project spread evenly across the state, but added that since "the city is going to get more of the benefits of it, I think it's OK."

DeAndre Horton, a Camden neighborhood resident and Vikings fan who stopped for breakfast, agreed.

"It's what they need to do to keep the team here," said Horton, 38.

'Losing proposition'

Several miles away, near Nicollet Island, Victor Grambsch, president of the local neighborhood association, expressed doubts.

"I see no economic benefit with the city for having a stadium," said Grambsch, 64. "To me, it's a losing proposition. And it's also clear the Vikings aren't going anywhere. It's extortion, and I don't think we should put up with it."

Across town, Linden Hills neighbors gathered at the home of Joan and Don Hawkinson on a recent night to talk about the stadium issue with Betsy Hodges, their council member.

"Why would Minneapolis pony up that kind of money when we have so many needs?" Joan Hawkinson asked. "If we do, it should be with the caveat that we get a lot of out of it. That our schools get something, that the North Side gets something, that our kids get something.

"I don't want the city of Minneapolis ponying up that kind of money and not get something. Let's get something out of it."

At Nelson's barbershop at 54th and Nicollet, opinions were divided, too.

Ken Heidelberg, 83, a retired chemical engineer, said it would be preferable to have "elected representatives make the decision" on a stadium, rather than voters. "It gets so ... complicated that the voters often don't know what's going on," he added. "Either they don't look at it enough or they don't understand it."

But Matt Kane, 52, who lives nearby, said the $338 million the city would commit over 30 years "is a lot of bucks. So making that call and dedicating that money to a stadium is a tough one."

Kane added that he is "ambivalent" about a referendum, saying "I don't like to see them do an end run around it, but I'm also not a big fan of government by referendum."

Nelson, a lifelong city resident, is conflicted. As a season ticket holder and longtime fan, he doesn't want the Vikings to skip town. But he also doesn't think the team needs a new home.

"You're talking to a frugal guy here," he said between haircuts. "The owners and the players they can buy their own stadium with the money they make."

Richard Meryhew • 612-673-4425

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions


Houston 2 FINAL
St. Louis 5
Washington 9 FINAL
Atlanta 8
Miami 5 FINAL
Boston 3
Minnesota 1 FINAL
Tampa Bay 2
NY Yankees 4 FINAL
Philadelphia 1
Baltimore 4 FINAL
Toronto 5
Detroit - LP: J. Mantiply 4 FINAL
NY Mets - WP: C. Torres 5
Cincinnati 5 FINAL
Chicago Cubs 2
Los Angeles 10 FINAL
Milwaukee 1
San Francisco 12 FINAL
Texas 3
Chicago WSox 0 FINAL
San Diego 5
Kansas City 11 FINAL
Cleveland 9
Seattle 4 FINAL
Los Angeles 7
Colorado 0 FINAL
LA Angels 3
Oakland 7 FINAL
Arizona 2
Pittsburgh 3 Top 6th Inning
NY Yankees 0
Chicago 68 4th Qtr 9:57
Indiana 70
Sacramento 95 4th Qtr 9:55
Orlando 97
Utah 66 4th Qtr 11:46
Philadelphia 55
Miami 75 4th Qtr 10:23
Washington 90
Toronto 75 4th Qtr 8:24
Charlotte 82
Cleveland 43 3rd Qtr
Atlanta 53
Boston 46 2nd Qtr 1:49
New Orleans 43
Detroit 38 2nd Qtr 4:12
Houston 44
LA Lakers 36 2nd Qtr 2:13
Memphis 39
Phoenix 33 2nd Qtr 5:33
Brooklyn 31
Denver 18 1st Qtr 4:55
San Antonio 26
Dallas 9:30 PM
Golden State
Columbus 3 3rd Prd
New Jersey 1
Minnesota 1 3rd Prd
Carolina 1
Buffalo 2 2nd Prd 8:25
Ottawa 1
Calgary 3 2nd Prd 6:33
Detroit 2
Edmonton 0 1st Prd 11:11
Chicago 0
Pittsburgh 9:00 PM
Longwood 68 FINAL
Char Southern 60
Ark-Pine Bluff 94 FINAL
Miss Valley St 75
Southern Ill 45 FINAL
Wichita State 56
Winthrop 67 FINAL
Radford 66
Evansville 67 FINAL
Illinois State 71
Towson 69 FINAL
Elon 74
Gardner-Webb 72 FINAL
High Point 71
Samford 76 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 81
Northern Ill 48 2nd Half 4:57
Ball State 46
Bowling Green 60 2nd Half 5:01
Buffalo 63
Brown 65 2nd Half 2:23
Dartmouth 61
Toledo 55 2nd Half 1:51
Eastern Mich 80
Akron 67 2nd Half 2:27
Kent State 70
Ill-Chicago 62 2nd Half 1:46
Oakland 59
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Ohio 95
Columbia 37 2nd Half 1:43
Penn 46
Cornell 53 FINAL
Princeton 66
Central Mich 53 2nd Half 4:28
Western Mich 63
Bradley 43 2nd Half 3:14
Northern Iowa 71
Morehead State 42 2nd Half 15:36
Murray State 49
Yale 22 2nd Half
Harvard 19
Furman 14 1st Half 11:24
Citadel 11
Coll of Charleston 5 1st Half 16:11
Drexel 7
UNC-Asheville 7:55 PM
Coastal Carolina
Texas Tech 8:00 PM
Pacific 8:00 PM
San Francisco
Detroit 8:30 PM
Cleveland State
Belmont 8:30 PM
Eastern Ky
Loyola-Chicago 8:35 PM
Indiana State
Loyola Marymount 10:30 PM
Santa Clara
Chicago 9:00 PM
Los Angeles
Saint Louis 63 FINAL
(21) George Washington 77
Wake Forest 68 FINAL
(16) Duke 77
Furman 55 FINAL
(17) Chattanooga 68
Monmouth 61 FINAL
Quinnipiac 82
Michigan State 60 FINAL
(4) Maryland 70
Belmont 65 FINAL
UT Martin 71
Arkansas 36 FINAL
(3) South Carolina 58
Mercer 56 FINAL
East Tenn St 66
Richmond 45 FINAL
Fordham 46
Miami-Florida 61 FINAL
(2) Notre Dame 77
Siena 61 FINAL
Iona 71
Washington St 48 FINAL
(9) Arizona State 67
Ark-Pine Bluff 63 FINAL
Miss Valley St 51
(23) Rutgers 57 FINAL
(24) Northwestern 62
Tennessee St 71 FINAL
SIU-Edwardsville 59
Loyola Marymount 50 FINAL
Gonzaga 70
(18) Texas A&M 65 FINAL
LSU 71
Cincinnati 76 FINAL
UCF 66
Saint Josephs 61 FINAL
Dayton 80
(19) Stanford 67
Santa Clara 42 FINAL
San Diego 51
Virginia Tech 43 FINAL
(7) Florida State 82
Memphis 71
Lehigh 75 FINAL
Holy Cross 62
Rhode Island 53 FINAL
Duquesne 66
North Florida 35 FINAL
(20) Fla Gulf Coast 74
Kennesaw St 54 FINAL
Jacksonville 55
Lipscomb 69 FINAL
Stetson 92
Saint Peters 57 FINAL
Marist 62
Navy 60 FINAL
Bucknell 49
Lafayette 56 FINAL
American Univ 79
Georgia 41 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 75
(13) Princeton 70 FINAL
Cornell 37
Harvard 68 FINAL
Yale 63
USC Upstate 36 2nd Half 4:00
Northern Ky 52
Nebraska 61 2nd Half 1:33
(14) Iowa 69
Colgate 43 1st OT 2:10
Army 44
Dartmouth 71 2nd Half
Brown 53
Penn 50 2nd Half 0:04
Columbia 36
Kansas 49 2nd Half 0:21
Kansas State 53
(15) North Carolina 26 1st Half 3:37
(10) Louisville 25
San Jose St 53 2nd Half
Houston 0 1st Half 16:41
Tulane 6
Utah State 8:00 PM
Colorado State
Colorado 8:00 PM
(8) Oregon State
New Mexico 8:00 PM
Minnesota 8:25 PM
Ohio State
(12) Kentucky 8:25 PM
(11) Miss State
San Diego State 8:30 PM
Niagara 8:30 PM
Texas Tech 8:30 PM
West Virginia
Boise State 9:00 PM
Fresno State
Washington 10:30 PM
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters



Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pmX10-6
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pmX30-28
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pmX30-12
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pmX19-3
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis NoonX34-6
Sep 14 - vs. New England NoonX30-7
Sep 21 - at New Orleans NoonX20-9
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pmX41-28
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pmX42-10
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit NoonX17-3
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo NoonX17-16
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay NoonX19-13 ot
Nov 2 - vs. Washington NoonX29-26
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago NoonX21-13
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay NoonX24-21
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina NoonX31-13
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets NoonX30-24 ot
Dec 14 - at Detroit 3:25 pmX16-14
Dec 21 - at Miami NoonX37-35
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago NoonX13-9




question of the day

Poll: Who is doing the best job coaching a Minnesota pro sports team?

Weekly Question