Jury of peers, not Vikings teammates, will shape Cook's fate

  • Article by: DAN WIEDERER , Star Tribune
  • Updated: March 6, 2012 - 6:59 AM

Football pushed far into background as his felony trial begins.

hide

Chris Cook

Photo: Richard Sennott, Star Tribune

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

By afternoon's end, Chris Cook stood, tugged at his suit jacket and cracked his neck - first left, then back to the right. He pushed his chair forward and stared at the courtroom ceiling for a few seconds.

This was the end of a tiring day and the beginning of a long and anxious week.

To Vikings fans, one question has hovered for four months now: When, if ever, will Cook be back on the field wearing his purple No. 31 jersey?

Yet on Monday, that question carried sobering context, Cook is not just a 25-year-old cornerback hopeful for a shot at NFL redemption, but also a defendant beginning his felony trial.

A little more than 19 weeks after an argument between Cook and his girlfriend turned violent in Eden Prairie, jury selection has begun for a case that will, in large part, determine Cook's future.

District Court File 27CR1133287: The State of Minnesota vs. Christopher O'Shea Cook.

The defendant faces two charges: domestic assault by strangulation and assault in the third degree.

On Monday, not long before lunch, Cook stood in courtroom 1653 in the Hennepin County Government Center and attentively watched 40 of his so-called peers parade in.

These were the prospective jurors, 12 of which will be selected -- likely by the end of Tuesday -- to consider evidence presented by the prosecution as well as Cook's defense attorneys.

Among the jurors who filed in: a law professor, a semitrailer truck driver, a bank vice president and a dialysis nurse.

Cook looked each of them over and paid close attention throughout the proceedings, his fate now being served to strangers, tied to an unnerving criminal case that should be ready for jury deliberation by early next week.

Professional football will have nothing to do with any of it.

Two sides to every story

On Monday afternoon, Juror No. 4 was excused, herself a former domestic abuse victim.

Juror No. 22 also exited after admitting on a written questionnaire that, based on what he had heard and read about the alleged crime, he couldn't be fair and impartial enough to provide Cook a presumption of innocence.

More jurors are likely to be excused Tuesday before opening statements begin.

It remains to be seen, for example, what attorneys will do with the college student from Maple Grove who admitted to being a die-hard Vikings fan and hinted that, in his mind, the prosecution may start out a little behind, noting Cook's return to action would be positive for his favorite team.

"I wish he'd get us to a Super Bowl," the juror quipped.

Which quickly served as a reminder of the two very different worlds Cook is a part of. This week, the bright lights, extravagant NFL stage Cook wants to return to will take a back seat to the high stakes civics lesson he is about to receive firsthand.

The more time that has passed since Cook's incarceration in October, the easier it has been for the details of his alleged crime to fade. Now, two prosecuting attorneys will attempt to reveal Cook's alleged vicious behavior beyond a reasonable doubt. The cornerback's attorneys will assert the violence came in self-defense.

Professional football will have nothing to do with any of it.

Changing stories

During pretrial discussions Monday, the state won a motion to admit prior statements, a victory for a prosecution that seems to be expecting the testimony from Cook's alleged victim to be different now than what she told police, detectives and doctors in the fall.

That ruling came amid revelations that the alleged victim had made recent statements that she still cares for and loves Cook.

The other major development came with the disclosure of new details from a call Cook made to his girlfriend from jail the afternoon following their altercation. In that conversation, the cornerback is said to have blamed his girlfriend for making him miss the Vikings' Week 7 game with Green Bay.

Cook's girlfriend reportedly then apologized for reporting the strangulation to police. That's what put Cook behind bars.

So now Cook will spend the rest of this week at the same defense table, in the same courtroom downtown, as the early hours of Oct. 22 are revisited by lawyers and witnesses and assessed by the jury.

A talented young cornerback will play a distressing waiting game, the arc of his life dependent on a verdict issued by 12 strangers.

Professional football will have nothing to do with any of it.

Dan Wiederer • • dan.wiederer@startribune.com

Kevin Williams wasn't surprised by revelations over the weekend that the New Orleans Saints put a bounty on Brett Favre in the 2009 NFC Championship Game. He saw it with his own eyes. "You hear things, but you don't know how much truth is behind it," the Vikings All-Pro defensive tackle said. "Especially after that game, you heard their game plan was to take Favre out of the game. You could pretty much tell that was what was going on." The Saints didn't knock Favre out of the game, but their late hits and over-the-line tactics took a toll. Favre looked like a human bruise in the locker room afterward. He was a 40-year-old quarterback who moved as if he were 80. "He was a wreck," Williams said. Two seasons later and with the Saints intentions now a matter of public record, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is poised to deliver his own form of harsh punishment to former defensive coordinator Gregg Williams and any other Saints employee who had knowledge of or participated in the bounty program that rewarded players for vicious hits and knocking opponents out of games. What the league uncovered in its investigation of the Saints bounty program didn't necessarily engender a sense of shock. More like disgust. The NFL's popularity continues to soar because the game is emotional and physical and, yes, violent. We're fascinated that players are willing to sacrifice their bodies and long-term health in ways that normal, sane people never would dare consider. It's a brutal world, but it shouldn't be without boundaries. Injury is an inherent part of the game. Intent to injure is a cardinal sin. "It's a gladiator game," said former NFL player Bob Stein. "It's not something that needs additional gas on the fire for injuries. If in fact it turns out that [the Saints] point is, 'We'll pay you for injuring other players,' to me that's way, way, way outside the lines." The timing of this story couldn't be any worse for Gregg Williams, the Saints or the NFL. The league is operating in the age of concussion awareness and increased player safety. The NFL has become diligent and vigilant about promoting safety and penalizing those who don't adhere to rules. Even borderline hits are now subject to steep fines. An increasing number of former players have stepped forward to share testimonials -- and join lawsuits against the NFL -- outlining how repeated brain trauma suffered during their career has affected their daily lives. With that sad reality as the backdrop, Goodell is handed a case in which a team fosters an environment that rewards players financially for imposing harm and injury on other players. That's why many league observers predict unprecedented punishment involving fines and suspensions that could include general manager Mickey Loomis and head coach Sean Payton, in addition to Williams, now the defensive coordinator in St. Louis. Favre told Sports Illustrated's Peter King that he isn't angry, but he's glad the truth is finally revealed. "I'm not going to make a big deal about it," he said. "In all honesty, there's a bounty of some kind on you on every play. Now, in that game there were some plays that, I don't want to say were odd, but I'd throw the ball and whack, on every play. Hand it off, whack. Over and over. Some were so blatant. I hand the ball to Percy Harvin early and got drilled right in the chin. They flagged that one at least." It is naive to suggest this kind of pay-for-pain arrangement is new or limited to one coach or locker room. Maybe it's not organized and promoted by a defensive coordinator, but it's not an isolated incident either. Former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka remembers one team had a "hit-list" that included a few of his star players in the mid-1980s. "I don't know if they were paid for it or whether they were just trying to get guys out of the game," he said. "Not going to say who it was because it doesn't matter, but it did happen to us." It might happen more than we even know because it's impossible to distinguish between heat-of-the-moment emotion and premeditation. Neither is acceptable, but one expects a certain mutual respect even in that cutthroat and ultra-competitive line of work. Fans love those big hits that cause a collective gasp in the crowd and make the TV highlights. It's fine if those bang-bang plays occur in the natural flow of the game. It's understandable and understood that sometimes players get hurt as a result. It crosses the line into malice, however, when a player predetermines that he's going to submarine a quarterback in the knees in order to injure him and collect some cash. That cannot be tolerated. "It's as wrong as it gets," Stein said. "From every perspective." Chip Scoggins • ascoggins@startribune.com
  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 32 FINAL
Team Carter 28
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 106 FINAL
New Orleans 109
Indiana 106 FINAL
Orlando 99
LA Clippers 120 FINAL
Phoenix 100
Minnesota 100 FINAL
Atlanta 112
Detroit 110 FINAL
Toronto 114
Milwaukee 95 FINAL
San Antonio 101
Boston 111 FINAL
Golden State 114
Washington 117 FINAL
Denver 115
Houston 99 FINAL
LA Lakers 87
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 81 FINAL
NC State 78
Belmont 63 FINAL
Tennessee St 55
Creighton 50 FINAL
Villanova 71
Northwestern 67 FINAL
Maryland 68
Washington 56 FINAL
Utah 77
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 71 FINAL
USC 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pmX10-6
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pmX30-28
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pmX30-12
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pmX19-3
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis NoonX34-6
Sep 14 - vs. New England NoonX30-7
Sep 21 - at New Orleans NoonX20-9
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pmX41-28
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pmX42-10
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit NoonX17-3
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo NoonX17-16
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay NoonX19-13 ot
Nov 2 - vs. Washington NoonX29-26
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago NoonX21-13
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay NoonX24-21
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina NoonX31-13
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets NoonX30-24 ot
Dec 14 - at Detroit 3:25 pmX16-14
Dec 21 - at Miami NoonX37-35
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago NoonX13-9

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Who will win the Super Bowl?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close