Vikings agree to downtown stadium study

  • Article by: PAUL LEVY and MIKE KASZUBA , Star Tribune staff writers
  • Updated: November 16, 2006 - 10:46 PM

The team will help with a plan that includes redevelopment near the Dome - and a retractable roof.

The Minnesota Vikings agreed Thursday to cooperate with a study to build a new stadium with a retractable roof in downtown Minneapolis near the Metrodome, a move that raised more doubts about the team's troubled stadium plans in Anoka County.

The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, owners and operators of the Metrodome, said a consultant yet to be hired would complete a report for the commission by Feb. 1 on the possibility of a new downtown Vikings stadium. The proposed stadium would be part of a wider revitalization of the area surrounding the Metrodome.

Executive Director Bill Lester said the commission doesn't intend to submit a plan for a stadium to the upcoming Legislature. Lester, along with other city and civic leaders, was vague about how a new downtown stadium would be financed, other than to say it would likely be less expensive than the Anoka County plan.

"It is our responsibility to try to keep the Vikings in Minnesota for the next 30 years," Roy Terwilliger, the commission's chairman, said in announcing the study.

While the Vikings -- who have played in the Metrodome for 24 years -- said Thursday they remain committed to Anoka County and still prefer an open-air stadium, their agreement to help with the study was the strongest indication yet that they would consider staying in downtown Minneapolis.

In the past four months, even as the team continued talks with Anoka County, Vikings owner Zygi Wilf has met with Minneapolis officials to discuss development opportunities. He also has met with the publisher of the Star Tribune, which owns five blocks near the Metrodome.

Even more telling Thursday was that Anoka County officials, who have been working with the team to have their own updated stadium plan ready by Jan. 15 for legislative approval, said they didn't know about the Vikings' agreement to participate in the study. Anoka County wants a retractable roof, which the Vikings have repeatedly rejected.

Nobody asked about the retractable roof at Thursday's meeting, but Lester Bagley, the Vikings' vice president of public affairs and stadium development, said afterward that the idea of a retractable roof came from the commission, not the Vikings. "Our position hasn't changed. Our preference is open air," Bagley said. The issue of the retractable roof sank the hopes of a Vikings stadium package in the Legislature earlier this year because nobody was willing to pay for it.

'A confusing group'

Anoka County's chief stadium negotiator reacted to the Minneapolis study announcement with dismay.

"I have no idea what they're doing," said Steve Novak. "They're becoming, more and more, a confusing group of people to work with." Novak said the team's "diversionary activities" were effectively "fouling up any kind of political strategy to get positive action" on the Anoka County proposal at the Legislature starting in January.

Novak said the county's agreement with the Vikings had been based on a handshake.

"Handshakes in Anoka County work pretty well. I guess we're discovering that maybe handshakes in New Jersey don't work quite as well," he said, referring to Wilf's home state.

But it was unclear how much traction a new Vikings stadium in downtown Minneapolis might have.

"Where this leads is uncertain," Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak said of the downtown stadium study. "Big things are about to happen there," he said, referring to redevelopment activity near the Metrodome, where the Vikings have a lease to play through 2011. With the Metrodome's other two major tenants, the Minnesota Twins and the University of Minnesota, already building new stadiums, the Metrodome's future is in doubt.

Sam Grabarski, the president of the Downtown Council, which represents many of downtown Minneapolis' leading corporations, said council officials had been briefed on the stadium study and have "always thought the best home for the Vikings was in downtown Minneapolis."

He said a stadium proposal that includes a climate-controlled facility surrounded by related development -- much like what Wilf had proposed in Anoka County with his multi-faceted Northern Lights concept -- would be better received by downtown corporate officials. A plan to build a new Vikings stadium by itself "would be a non-starter," he said.

But Grabarski, Rybak and others said financing details for such a project downtown -- especially who would match the $280 million Anoka County has pledged to a new stadium -- would not come until a detailed development plan was completed.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Cleveland 86 FINAL
Indiana 93
Washington 81 FINAL
Philadelphia 89
Golden State 113 FINAL
Toronto 89
New York 121 FINAL
Detroit 115
Orlando 88 FINAL
Atlanta 95
Charlotte 98 FINAL
Boston 106
LA Clippers 97 FINAL
Memphis 79
Brooklyn 98 FINAL
Houston 102
Miami 102 FINAL
New Orleans 104
Minnesota 89 FINAL
Chicago 96
Utah 104 FINAL
Denver 82
San Antonio 107 FINAL
Sacramento 96
Milwaukee 93 FINAL
LA Lakers 101
Oklahoma City 112 FINAL
Portland 115
Boston 3 FINAL(OT)
New Jersey 2
Calgary 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 2
Washington 0 FINAL
Carolina 3
Chicago 0 FINAL
Tampa Bay 4
Colorado 5 FINAL(SO)
Dallas 4
Los Angeles 2 FINAL
Anaheim 4
Siena 63 FINAL
Quinnipiac 73
Harvard 49 FINAL
Cornell 57
Penn 69 FINAL
Brown 75
Fairfield 65 FINAL
Canisius 72
Manhattan 75 FINAL
Iona 79
Saint Peters 67 FINAL
Marist 69
Princeton 60 FINAL
Yale 81
Ohio 58 FINAL
Akron 70
Dartmouth 84 FINAL
Columbia 71
Valparaiso 56 FINAL
Cleveland State 53
Louisiana Tech 75 FINAL
Texas-El Paso 88
Seton Hall 77 FINAL
Xavier 60
Cornell 54 FINAL
Harvard 60
Yale 49 FINAL
(14) Princeton 67
Elon 51 FINAL
Drexel 54
Northeastern 47 FINAL
James Madison 82
St Johns 60 FINAL
Butler 49
Creighton 71 FINAL
Georgetown 62
Brown 58 FINAL
Penn 75
Columbia 50 FINAL
Dartmouth 60
Canisius 54 FINAL
Siena 58
St Josephs Brooklyn 35 FINAL
NJIT 78
Western Carolina 86 FINAL
UNC Greensboro 80
Colorado 66 FINAL
Arizona 51
Southern Ill 72 FINAL
Bradley 66
Drake 59 FINAL
Wichita State 80
Indiana State 71 FINAL
Evansville 53
Illinois State 53 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 67
Northern Iowa 70 FINAL
Missouri State 72
Utah 42 FINAL
(10) Arizona State 46
Providence 62 FINAL
Villanova 71
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2014 preseason     
Aug 8 - vs. Oakland 7 pmX10-6
Aug 16 - vs. Arizona 7:30 pmX30-28
Aug 23 - at Kansas City 7 pmX30-12
Aug 28 - at Tennessee 7 pmX19-3
2014 regular season     
Sep 7 - at St. Louis NoonX34-6
Sep 14 - vs. New England NoonX30-7
Sep 21 - at New Orleans NoonX20-9
Sep 28 - vs. Atlanta 3:25 pmX41-28
Oct 2 - at Green Bay 7:25 pmX42-10
Oct 12 - vs. Detroit NoonX17-3
Oct 19 - at. Buffalo NoonX17-16
Oct 26 - at Tampa Bay NoonX19-13 ot
Nov 2 - vs. Washington NoonX29-26
Nov 9 - Bye
Nov 16 - at Chicago NoonX21-13
Nov. 23 - vs. Green Bay NoonX24-21
Nov. 30 - vs. Carolina NoonX31-13
Dec 7 - vs. NY Jets NoonX30-24 ot
Dec 14 - at Detroit 3:25 pmX16-14
Dec 21 - at Miami NoonX37-35
Dec 28 - vs. Chicago NoonX13-9

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: With Adrian Peterson's suspension overturned, what should the Vikings do?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close