Are Vikings a better football team?

  • Article by: Kevin Seifert , Star Tribune
  • Updated: July 25, 2007 - 12:08 AM
  • share

    email

"The Minnesota Vikings will be a better football team this year. that’s my strong belief."

— Brad Childress, March 2007

As the saying goes, 'If you’re not getting better ...’ well, you know the rest. Have the Vikings improved themselves from Brad Childress’ lackluster debut in 2006? We’ll start finding out as training camp opens this week.

Before speeding to Mankato, however, the Vikings must ensure they have maintained their strengths while shoring up their weaknesses. Staff writer Kevin Seifert, using a boldly optimistic comment from Childress earlier this year as a springboard, checks on four crucial areas of the team:

OFFENSE

Must improve

Big plays in passing game: The Vikings set a franchise low with 13 touchdown passes in 2006. Their 6.3-yard average per attempt was their worst in 22 years. Both were the result of few downfield options and multiple red-zone woes. Simply put: They must be more dynamic through the air. New starter Tarvaris Jackson has a steep learning curve to overcome, but his live arm, as well as the healthy recklessness of youth, will give him a chance.

Skill level of pass catchers: Personnel at receiver and tight end have been overhauled, but it remains to be seen if the new group is any better. In essence, the Vikings have only one proven receiver: Bobby Wade, whom they envision mostly as a slot. Did Nike eye doctors cure Troy Williamson of the drops? Can one of the three drafted rookies — Sidney Rice, Aundrae Allison and Chandler Williams — make an immediate impact? Will new TE Visanthe Shiancoe, whose hands seemed shaky in spring drills, prove to be a downfield threat?

Cohesion on the offensive line: This high-priced group must hit the ground running this summer. LT Bryant McKinnie, LG Steve Hutchinson and C Matt Birk spent much of 2006 getting used to each other, all while personnel on the right side fluctuated. A young quarterback must know his line is impervious to botched protections and unblocked blitzers, both regular problems in 2006.

Can't get worse

Running game: RB Chester Taylor was the best thing about the offense until he broke down in December. If nothing else, the arrival of RB Adrian Peterson should help extend Taylor's shelf life through the end of the season. And in reality, Peterson should elevate the entire offense's big-play ability. With all the moving parts in the passing game, the Vikings need a multifaceted running attack to carry them through games. No one wants to ask Jackson to win them on his own.

DEFENSE

Must improve

Pass rush: New coordinator Leslie Frazier must find a way to elevate a pass defense that averaged only one sack for every 30 passes in 2006. Frazier has hinted at a more dynamic blitz package, but he must also cajole double-digit sacks from at least one of his defensive linemen. One of his projects is second-year player Ray Edwards, who has nifty moves and might earn the starting job at right end.

Nickel coverage: The inability to stop the spread offense last year exposed a weakness in nickel coverage. The Tampa-2 hole between linebackers and defensive backs must be locked down. Assuming he hasn't lost any speed since suffering a serious knee injury last summer, LB Chad Greenway will help. So will two candidates for the nickel defensive backs job, Dovonte Edwards and rookie Marcus McCauley.

Can't get worse

Run defense: It would be understandable if the Vikings slipped a bit in this category, given their near-historic performance last season. But they don't want to give back any improvement against the pass by becoming vulnerable to the run. The Vikings should be protected as long as DTs Kevin and Pat Williams remain healthy and active. MLB E.J. Henderson is at least the equal of departed Napoleon Harris against the run.

Big plays: It might not seem fair to expect another five defensive touchdowns this season, matching the Vikings' 2006 total, but it's one way to mitigate an offense that again could have trouble scoring. Considering Frazier's plans for creative and regular blitzes, the potential exists.

  • share

    email

ADVERTISEMENT

LA Lakers 88 FINAL
Boston 87
Golden State 109 FINAL
Denver 101
Houston 96 FINAL
Phoenix 89
Oklahoma City 101 FINAL
Sacramento 106
St. Louis 4 FINAL(SO)
New Jersey 3
Montreal 4 FINAL
NY Islanders 2
Tampa Bay 3 FINAL(OT)
NY Rangers 4
Toronto 3 FINAL
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL(SO)
Washington 2
Dallas 4 FINAL
Columbus 2
Nashville 3 FINAL
Ottawa 4
Los Angeles 1 FINAL
Florida 3
Vancouver 5 FINAL
Minnesota 2
Calgary 1 FINAL(OT)
Phoenix 2
(21) Wisconsin 68 FINAL
Minnesota 61
Ole Miss 60 FINAL
(20) Miss State 70
Illinois 71 FINAL
(23) Indiana 84
Tennessee St 72 FINAL
(9) Murray State 68
(16) St Marys-CA 59 FINAL
Gonzaga 73
Old Dominion 63 FINAL
(12) Delaware 76
Wisconsin 54 FINAL
(18) Penn State 69
(5) Duke 71 FINAL
Boston College 62
(8) Maryland 91 FINAL
Clemson 61
Detroit 70 FINAL
(9) Green Bay 58
(10) Ohio State 65 FINAL
Illinois 66
(24) South Carolina 47 FINAL
Arkansas 68
Michigan 63 FINAL
(13) Nebraska 52
U-S-C 52 FINAL
(4) Stanford 69
(19) Gonzaga 40 FINAL
B-Y-U 70
(11) Tennessee 79 FINAL
Vanderbilt 93

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Rate the Super Bowl

Weekly Question
 
Close