Twins on pace to set record for fewest errors and they are not alone

  • Article by: PHIL MILLER , Star Tribune
  • Updated: August 24, 2013 - 7:52 PM

The Twins could set a team record for fewest errors in a season. And errors, throughout the major leagues, are down.

hide

Minnesota Twins' Brian Dozier tags out Detroit Tigers' Prince Fielder during second-inning action at Comerica Park in Detroit, Michigan, Thursday, August 22, 2013.

Photo: Diane Weiss, Mct - Mct

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

The baseball spun out of Brian Dozier’s glove before he could flip it to second base last Wednesday, and the batter and baserunner were both safe. Moments later, Dozier fielded Prince Fielder’s ground ball cleanly, but his throw pulled first baseman Chris Colabello off the bag.

And just like that, Dozier had experienced an incident that’s becoming as rare as hitting for the cycle, as unusual as a triple play: He committed two errors in one inning.

That’s hard to do in the modern major leagues, where the notion of tallying a fielder’s mistakes seems to be as out of date as polyester jerseys. The Twins, with 55 errors going into Friday’s game, are on pace to break the franchise record for fewest errors this season — 74 committed by the 2002 Twins — but it’s not just them. Errors are being recorded with record-breaking infrequency all around the majors.

American League teams are averaging .556 errors per game in 2013, and the Twins, charged with .437 per game, are markedly better than that. In 1999, teams were charged with .703 errors per game, so there’s been a 38 percent reduction from then. The skyrocketing number of strikeouts has something to do with it — there were 5,000 more strikeouts in the majors last year than a decade earlier, greatly cutting the number of batted balls to be fielded — but errors are way down even on balls put in play.

Around the majors, an error is committed on one in every 46.4 balls in play this year, well down from the one-in-38.5 rate of 1999.

There’s little doubt that better fielders playing with better equipment are likely responsible for the reduction in errors. But, face it: What’s the first factor that you think of?

“Everybody says it’s the scorer, no doubt,” said Stew Thornley, the baseball historian who, along with former Pioneer Press sportswriter Gregg Wong, serves as official scorer at Target Field. “I’m sure that’s the perception. We hear it all the time.”

It’s more than perception, however. Thornley is part of a three-scorer advisory committee that is attempting to standardize offical scoring in all ballparks. “Our objective is to make an error called in one park to be an error everywhere, so it’s a level playing field,” he said.

Thornley said baseball’s review process, which last year began allowing players to appeal a scorer’s ruling to Joe Torre, MLB’s executive vice president of baseball operations, has helped establish leaguewide guidelines. “When a call has been reversed, that helps me to understand what standard the league wants,” Thornley said.

Basically, MLB seems to rely on rule 10.05(a), which explains “the official scorer shall always give the batter the benefit of the doubt.” Thornley said his own standards of hit-or-error have changed on short-hop grounders; if the ball stays lows and a fielder bobbles it, it’s an error. “But if it comes up higher than you’d expect, that’s a really tough play to react to,” he said.

“When a ball drops between fielders, or when someone takes a bad route and makes what could have been an easier play much harder — it’s hard for fans to understand why we rule those hits,” Thornley said. “In a lot of cases, there’s no right or wrong call, but we have to acknowledge that the line between hit and error is always going to be fuzzy, not fine. We want to reduce that band of fuzziness.”

Triple digits

Last week, Justin Verlander threw 121 pitches in a 7-6 loss to the Twins, the fifth time he’s eclipsed 120 pitches — just against Minnesota — since the last Twins pitcher to reach that mark against anyone: Nick Blackburn, on May 24, 2011. In fact, an opposing starter has reached 120 pitches against the Twins 16 times since Blackburn’s long outing. But the Twins ask their starters to throw an extended number of pitches less often than most teams. A look at this year’s rankings, through Thursday:

Starts of 110 or more pitches: 1. Tigers 43, 2. White Sox 35, t3. Nationals 27, t3. Rangers 27, t24. Twins 8.

Starts of 115 or more pitches: 1. Tigers 17, 2. White Sox 15, 3. Rangers 13, 4. Red Sox 12, t26. Twins 1.

Most pitches thrown by a Twins starter:

151: Willie Banks, Aug. 14, 1993, no-decision

143: Rich Robertson, June 24, 1996, win

  • related content

  • Reds third baseman Todd Frazier bobbled a ball in a recent game. But errors are becoming less common in the majors — and the hard-hit ball on this play was ruled a hit.

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

ADVERTISEMENT

Team Irvin 7:15 PM
Team Carter
Miami 96 FINAL
Chicago 84
Oklahoma City 98 FINAL
Cleveland 108
Dallas 102 4th Qtr 3:52
New Orleans 99
Indiana 95 4th Qtr 3:07
Orlando 95
LA Clippers 105 4th Qtr 4:50
Phoenix 94
Minnesota 98 4th Qtr 1:50
Atlanta 108
Detroit 53 3rd Qtr
Toronto 58
Milwaukee 55 3rd Qtr
San Antonio 47
Boston 5 1st Qtr 9:45
Golden State 5
Washington 7 1st Qtr 9:30
Denver 9
Houston 8:30 PM
LA Lakers
Team Toews 17 FINAL
Team Foligno 12
South Florida 53 FINAL
Connecticut 66
Boston College 64 FINAL
Georgia Tech 62
Virginia 50 FINAL
Virginia Tech 47
Indiana 70 FINAL
Ohio State 82
Stony Brook 61 FINAL
Binghamton 54
Cincinnati 56 FINAL
UCF 46
Maine 70 FINAL
Hartford 61
Monmouth 64 FINAL
Manhattan 71
Fairfield 67 FINAL
Marist 73
Rowan 48 FINAL
Princeton 96
St Bonaventure 48 FINAL
Rhode Island 53
Duke 77 FINAL
St Johns 68
Saint Peters 69 FINAL
Siena 55
Drake 40 FINAL
Wichita State 74
Vermont 61 FINAL
UMass Lowell 50
Seton Hall 57 FINAL
Butler 77
NJIT 72 FINAL
South Alabama 55
Northern Iowa 54 FINAL
Illinois State 53
Louisville 80 FINAL
Pittsburgh 68
UMBC 55 FINAL
Albany 69
Niagara 64 FINAL
Iona 87
Notre Dame 66 2nd Half 1:16
NC State 69
Belmont 45 2nd Half 11:37
Tennessee St 37
Creighton 24 2nd Half 15:30
Villanova 40
Northwestern 34 1st Half 4:50
Maryland 24
Washington 7:30 PM
Utah
Senior-North 34 FINAL
Senior-South 13
Seton Hall 99 FINAL
Georgetown 85
St Johns 69 FINAL
Villanova 81
Arkansas 58 FINAL
Florida 72
Maine 56 FINAL
UMBC 42
Vanderbilt 55 FINAL
Alabama 52
Lafayette 60 FINAL
Lehigh 65
UCF 61 FINAL
SMU 57
Utah 51 FINAL
Washington 63
James Madison 73 FINAL
Coll of Charleston 53
Delaware 56 FINAL
Drexel 61
Hofstra 56 FINAL
William & Mary 57
Hartford 58 FINAL
Albany 82
Binghamton 54 FINAL
Stony Brook 67
Towson 63 FINAL
UNC-Wilmington 71
Wake Forest 80 FINAL
(17) Florida State 110
Georgia Tech 68 FINAL
Virginia 62
(22) Georgia 51 FINAL
(5) Tennessee 59
Drake 79 FINAL
Evansville 62
Iona 80 FINAL
Canisius 62
Fairfield 33 FINAL
Monmouth 59
Northwestern 75 FINAL
Penn State 76
Wisconsin 71 FINAL
Michigan State 77
Ohio State 79 FINAL
Purdue 71
Northern Iowa 57 FINAL
Indiana State 55
Butler 58 FINAL
Xavier 54
Creighton 93 FINAL
Marquette 75
Providence 42 FINAL
DePaul 90
Northeastern 77 FINAL
Elon 80
(2) Connecticut 96 FINAL
Cincinnati 31
Oregon 78 FINAL
Arizona 81
Bradley 46 FINAL
Loyola-Chicago 45
NC State 49 FINAL
(23) Syracuse 66
(7) Maryland 84 FINAL
Indiana 74
Illinois State 35 FINAL
Missouri State 58
Colorado 68 FINAL
Washington St 73
Tulane 45 FINAL
South Florida 64
(14) Kentucky 83 FINAL
Missouri 69
(9) Oregon State 68 FINAL
(13) Arizona State 57
Vermont 63 FINAL
UMass Lowell 72
Iowa State 58 FINAL
(8) Texas 57
Southern Ill 61 FINAL
Wichita State 80
(15) Duke 74 FINAL
(12) North Carolina 67
Miami-Florida 55 FINAL
(4) Louisville 68
(21) Minnesota 61 FINAL
(25) Rutgers 66
California 72 FINAL
UCLA 57
(11) Stanford 2 1st Half 18:25
USC 3
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: How optimistic are you about the 2015 Twins?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close