Public lands: How much?

  • Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
  • Updated: February 17, 2010 - 5:26 AM

Minnesota's policy of acquiring lands has come under fire, and the issue is likely to remain a hot topic of debate.

hide

The state’s WMAs are heavily used each fall by hunters.

Minnesota's wildlife management area system -- nearly 1,400 public areas totaling 1.3 million acres of habitat around the state -- is treasured by state hunters.

Each fall, the public lands are tramped by thousands of hunters. The lands also provide prime habitat for non-game wildlife, such as songbirds and swans.

Those public prairies, wetlands and forests also are open for trappers, wildlife watchers, photographers and others who seek wild places. And the lands also prevent erosion and improve water quality.

Since the system started in 1951 under the "Save the Wetlands'' program, it has been slowly growing as the state and conservation groups add additional parcels. A citizens committee comprised of conservation group members recommended in 2002 that the state acquire 700,000 additional acres over 50 years -- including 200,000 in the first 10 years -- to meet rising demands for wildlife and recreation by a growing population.

The goal isn't being met. During the past 10 years, the Department of Natural Resources has acquired 51,000 acres of WMA lands, either through purchase from willing sellers or donations, at a cost of $62 million.

Concerns clashing

But increasingly, some legislators, county officials and farm groups are questioning the state's policy of acquiring lands. Their concerns clash head-on with hunting and other conservation groups, who say land acquisition should remain a key component of wildlife habitat preservation.

Among those expressing concern recently over land acquisitions:

• Chris Radatz, public policy director for the Minnesota Farm Bureau, said his members are concerned Outdoor Heritage Fund dollars from the Legacy Amendment will "lead to a huge land grab,'' and he urged officials to consider other options.

• At least 16 counties in the state, mostly in the north, have passed resolutions saying they want "no net gain'' of public land. Land acquisition is a "big concern'' for counties, said Annalee Garletz, policy analyst for the Association of Minnesota Counties. One worry, she said, is payment in lieu of taxes (PILT), which the state pays annually to compensate counties for taking land off the tax rolls.

• The Grant County Board recently rejected a request by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to buy 370 acres for a federal waterfowl production area, a program that provides wildlife lands for public hunting and other uses, similar to the state's wildlife management areas. The county rejected the request, even though the Fish and Wildlife Service, like the state, compensates counties for removing land from tax rolls. "It's prime wildlife habitat,'' said Don Kleven of the Fish and Wildlife Service. Having a county reject an acquisition "is infrequent but not unusual,'' he said. "Some counties always turn us down.'' The agency will appeal to a state board that usually OKs the purchases.

• Legislators have increasingly questioned the acquisition of lands with Outdoor Heritage Fund dollars and by the Legislative Citizens Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR), which recommends spending of lottery dollars. Legislators have asked the Legislative Auditor to look at DNR landholdings and easements, and a report is expected soon. Also at issue for the Outdoor Heritage Fund dollars from the Legacy Amendment is the definition of "protect, enhance and restore.''

"We didn't use the word 'buy,' we used 'protect,' " said Rep. Jean Wagenius, DFL-Minneapolis. "Protect includes prevent. We need fish barriers [for example] to keep Asian carp from coming up the Mississippi River. That's prevention. Do I support buying public lands? Absolutely. We should be buying the best of the best."

But she said money also is needed to restore and manage habitat on those and existing public lands. "When we get a piece of land, it comes with management costs and PILT payment costs," she said.

The state paid about $5 million in 2009 for PILT payments for wildlife management areas, part of $22 million in PILT payments for state lands, including tax-forfeited lands. That money comes from the state's general fund.

Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL-South St. Paul, is another legislator who has raised concerns about land acquisition. He sits on the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council, which recommends how Outdoor Heritage Fund dollars are spent. The council recently recommended protecting 16,000 acres, nearly 10,000 through acquisition, for fiscal years 2011-13. Acquisition would total about $23 million of the $59 million to be spent.

"I'm not anti-acquisition," Hansen said. "But the acquisition has to be prioritized and targeted to the best, most-needed places. We need to take care of the many properties we already own."

At a hearing Monday, some legislators questioned a proposal by the LCCMR to spend $6.7 million to acquire wildlife lands.

"We should look less at acquisition and more at management and investment in existing holdings and easements we have," said Rep. Ron Shimanski, R-Silver Lake. Private landowners sometimes have to compete with the DNR or conservation groups to buy land, he said.

The state's legacy

But conservation groups, legislators and others say land acquisition is a vital part of wildlife habitat protection. They say that with the state population expected to grow, demand for public lands will increase while land costs rise. A citizen budget oversight committee recommended last year that the Legislature increase WMA funding.

Unlike some temporary easements, it permanently protects grasslands, wetlands and forests. And while easements acquired on private lands have no public access, acquired lands are open to the public.

"The wildlife management area system is a key component of our outdoor recreation system," said Mike Kilgore, a hunter, University of Minnesota professor and chair of the Lessard-Sams Council.

The main funding for those lands has been a surcharge on small game hunting licenses, hunting license fees, Critical Habitat license plates, lottery proceeds and bonding. John Edmund, director of Explore Minnesota Tourism, told legislators that travel to parks, trails and other recreational lands is a big part of the state's $11 billion travel industry, producing 245,000 jobs.

Said Garry Leaf, executive director of Sportsmen for Change, "A lot of hunters can't afford their own private hunting land.''

Mark Johnson, executive director of the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, said public lands attract hunters and others who bring revenue to counties. "We have the right to hunt and fish in Minnesota, but if you don't have access, what good is it?" he said. "St. Paul and the Legislature are thinking less about our hunting and fishing heritage and are forgetting about what makes life special in Minnesota.''

Doug Smith • dsmith@startribune.com

  • related content

  • Pawlenty’s budget ax falls on DNR, too

    Tuesday February 16, 2010

    The DNR would take at least a $3 million hit in 2010-2011 if the budget released by Gov. Tim Pawlenty is approved by the Legislature -- and the amount could...

  • Deer hunters seek probe of Kahn

    Tuesday February 16, 2010

    Mark Johnson, executive director of the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, has asked Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher to investigate whether Rep. Phyllis Kahn, DFL-Minneapolis, engaged in a "breach of ethics."

  • Hunters took fewer deer in 2009

    Tuesday February 16, 2010

    The 12.5 percent drop in the number of deer taken by Minnesota hunters was part of the DNR's herd management plan.

  • Mexican gray wolf on loose in Forest Lake

    Tuesday February 16, 2010

    A Forest Lake science center hopes that the beckoning howls of 41 wolves and a waiting meal of venison will entice a missing Mexican gray wolf back to the cage...

  • Deer

  • Wetlands

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

New England 2/1/15 5:30 PM
Seattle
Toronto 104 FINAL
Indiana 91
Cleveland 103 FINAL
Detroit 95
Milwaukee 109 FINAL
Miami 102
Memphis 109 FINAL
Dallas 90
Chicago 113 FINAL
Golden State 111
Washington 98 FINAL
LA Lakers 92
NY Rangers 1 FINAL
NY Islanders 4
Arizona 3 FINAL(SO)
Philadelphia 4
Winnipeg 3 FINAL
Pittsburgh 5
Washington 3 FINAL
Columbus 4
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Carolina 4
Dallas 2 FINAL
Montreal 3
Detroit 5 FINAL
Florida 4
Colorado 3 FINAL(OT)
Nashville 4
Buffalo 1 FINAL
Calgary 4
Minnesota 2 FINAL
Edmonton 1
Anaheim 4 FINAL
Vancouver 0
Ball State 47 FINAL
Akron 59
Northern Ill 46 FINAL
Bowling Green 56
Western Mich 71 FINAL
Buffalo 77
Ohio 40 FINAL
Eastern Mich 76
Xavier 66 FINAL
Georgetown 53
Vanderbilt 62 FINAL
Georgia 70
West Virginia 65 FINAL
Kansas State 59
Central Mich 53 FINAL
Kent State 63
Saint Josephs 48 FINAL
La Salle 53
Nebraska 44 FINAL
Michigan 58
Miami-Ohio 65 FINAL
Toledo 70
Tulsa 62 FINAL
Tulane 55
George Washington 48 FINAL
VA Commonwealth 72
Pittsburgh 67 FINAL
Virginia Tech 70
Indiana State 78 FINAL
Evansville 89
Tabor College 53 FINAL
Oral Roberts 94
Florida 52 FINAL
Alabama 50
Tennessee 64 FINAL
Arkansas 69
Texas A&M 71 FINAL
Auburn 61
Baylor 53 FINAL
Oklahoma State 64
DePaul 0 Postponed
Providence 0
Michigan State 0 Postponed
Rutgers 0
Wyoming 44 FINAL
Utah State 56
Fresno State 47 FINAL
San Diego St 58
UNLV 67 FINAL
Nevada 62
SD Christian 54 FINAL
CS-Bakersfield 79
Colorado State 78 FINAL
Boise State 82
Temple 71 FINAL
UCF 54
Campbell 42 FINAL
Presbyterian 51
Coastal Carolina 65 FINAL
High Point 73
Gardner-Webb 49 FINAL
Radford 59
UNC-Asheville 58 FINAL
Liberty 62
Winthrop 63 FINAL
Longwood 62
Columbia International 33 FINAL
Charleston Southern 74
Tulane 63 FINAL
Houston 46
(3) Baylor 89 FINAL
TCU 67
Navy 49 FINAL
American Univ 59
Valparaiso 42 FINAL
Illinois-Chicago 60
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close