Deer Hunters want the deer fed during harsh winters, but the DNR fears it could spread disease.
Two things are certain in Minnesota during a tough winter like one the state is experiencing: Some deer are going to die. And the debate over whether to feed deer artificially, particularly in northern Minnesota, in an attempt to minimize losses to the whitetail population will surface.
Such is the case now, as some northern Minnesotans, led by the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association (MDHA), are asking the Department of Natural Resources to initiate a deer feeding program.
“If the DNR doesn’t allow it, I think it would be shortsighted,’’ said Mark Johnson, executive director of the MDHA, headquartered in Grand Rapids. “The public concern in northern Minnesota for our low deer numbers is already intense. No one wants to lose any more animals.’’
So far, however, the DNR is holding fast to its position that deer feeding is ineffective and potentially problematic.
“In recent years we’ve controlled bovine TB in northwest Minnesota and chronic wasting disease in the southeast, and we’ve invested more than $10 million battling those diseases,’’ said Michelle Carstensen, DNR wildlife health program supervisor.
“Feeding deer, because it concentrates animals and brings them into close contact with one another, runs the risk of causing the same problems again.’’
The decision whether to feed deer probably won’t hinge on money availability. For the past 15 years, 50 cents of every deer-hunting license has been assigned to a special deer-feeding fund — an account with a name and purpose that were amended in 2004 so its money also could be spent for CWD and TB studies and eradication.
The fund holds about $800,000.
“We wouldn’t be looking to spend all of it,’’ Johnson said. “I think if we do start a deer-feeding program, it would cost between $100,000 and $200,000.”
Beyond debate is the deadly toll that severe winters can take on deer. A study of northern Minnesota fawn mortality between 1991 and 2005 showed the rate more than doubled in a winter that was above average in severity when compared with an average winter.
Even before the current winter began, many Minnesota deer hunters worried the whitetail population was too small. Last winter was fairly tough, and some animals died. These losses, combined with DNR deer harvest goals that in recent years some hunters believe have been too high, have reduced whitetail numbers unacceptably in many areas, hunters believe.
DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr said recently he is among hunters who haven’t seen a deer from his stand in four years.
“I also saw zero deer last fall, and I hunted a lot,’’ Johnson said. “I know other hunters who also saw no deer, or few. That’s something the DNR should think about. The multiple licenses I bought last fall cost me $112. Next hunting season I’ll spend just $30 for one license. Multiply the difference between $112 and $30 by hundreds of thousands of deer hunters, and that’s a lot of money.’’
Minnesota’s most recent deer-killing winters occurred back-to-back, in 1995-1996, followed by 1996-1997.
The DNR estimates about 30 percent of the state’s whitetail herd was lost the first winter, followed by about 8 percent the second.
“This winter also has the makings of a severe winter,’’ DNR wildlife section chief Paul Telander said. “But so far it’s not as bad as those two.’’
During those successive bad winters a debate also ensued about deer feeding. The Legislature became involved — not unexpectedly — and ultimately mandated that feeding begin, despite the DNR’s objections.
|NY Mets||1||Top 7th Inning|
|St. Louis||5||Bottom 7th Inning|
|Chicago Cubs||3:05 PM|
|San Francisco||3:05 PM|
|LA Angels||3:05 PM|
|Chicago WSox||3:05 PM|
|Oklahoma City||7:00 PM|
|LA Clippers||9:30 PM|
|Holy Cross||6:00 PM|
Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?