Complaints over falling deer harvest grow louder

  • Updated: January 15, 2014 - 12:03 AM

The head of Bowhunters Inc. says revisions are needed for 2014.

hide

Minnesota’s deer harvest last season of about 172,000 whitetails was down 7 percent from last year, and was the lowest since 1998.

Photo: Associated Press photo,

CameraStar Tribune photo galleries

Cameraview larger

Brooks Johnson says Minnesota’s deer population is too low.

And he’s not alone.

Other hunters are grumbling, too, after a 2013 season that produced the lowest deer harvest in 15 years — and a 17 percent decline since 2010.

But Johnson, 46, of Monticello, is doing more than complaining. He has launched a new effort called the Minnesota Deer Density Initiative to push the Department of Natural Resources to boost the deer population. He’s holding meetings with hunters, hunting groups and legislators, and collecting signatures on a petition demanding that deer density goals be revised immediately.

“The low deer numbers are severely diminishing the quality of the hunt in much of the state,’’ he wrote in a letter to DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr, saying deer densities in many areas were set too low years ago in the DNR’s goal-setting process.

“It’s a widespread problem,’’ said Johnson, an avid whitetail hunter and president of Minnesota Bowhunters Inc.

DNR officials don’t deny that whitetail numbers are below agency goals in some areas.

“There are certain areas where the number of deer are way below what we’d like to see,’’ Landwehr said over the weekend in Bloomington at an annual meeting with citizens. “I haven’t seen a deer [while hunting] in the last four years.’’

But they also say hunters can’t expect to shoot record and near-record numbers of whitetails, as they did from 2002 to 2007 — including a record 290,000 deer in 2003.

Reason for decline

While there’s some agreement the deer population is too low, there’s plenty of disagreement over why. Last winter was hard on deer in the north, and this winter isn’t looking much better.

But Johnson blames the DNR’s deer density goal-setting process from 2005-07, when the deer population in many areas was deemed too high. Fifteen groups, each with about 20 citizens selected by the DNR, met with the agency, and it was decided to reduce deer densities substantially in many areas by liberalizing hunting regulations.

Johnson and others now say those groups didn’t adequately represent the best interest of hunters, that some members, including farmers, insurance companies and the foresters, swayed the groups to reduce deer densities too much.

“I don’t think there was an equitable voice for Minnesota hunters,’’ Johnson said. “No one was watching. Private industry had too many seats at the table, and there was an agenda to lower deer numbers. Guys I talked to said they were basically buffaloed into helping lower deer numbers.’’

Lou Cornicelli, DNR wildlife research manger, then the big game program leader who instigated the deer density goal-setting process, strongly disagrees. Those selected to the citizen groups represented a broad range of interests, but all had an interest in deer, and the vast majority were hunters, he said.

“We attempted to have a broad distribution of people,’’ Cornicelli said, which included the timber industry in the north and farmers in the south, because both are impacted by deer. “We tried consciously not to stack the deck one way or another.’’

Cornicelli said the DNR didn’t solicit auto insurance industry representatives, as some have alleged.

“There might have been one or two people who worked for an insurance company, but it [the industry] wasn’t represented.’’

He said other characterizations of the process as tainted are “incorrect, misleading or just flat wrong.’’

Said Cornicelli: “We set the goals through a very public process. There’s nothing wrong with people not liking the results and wanting to revisit it. But it has to be open and honest and fair, which was done before.’’

New goals being set

The DNR began reexamining deer density goals in 2012, and new goals have been established in 23 deer permit areas. This winter, the DNR is reexamining permit areas in much of southeastern Minnesota, and will soon select a stakeholder group from about 100 nominees.

“There’s definitely a lot of interest,’’ said Leslie McInenly, current DNR big game program leader. Both public meetings, and meetings with the stakeholder group, will be held. Online comments also will be accepted, as they were last time.

Similar groups will be formed in other areas of the state, so deer densities statewide should be revised by the fall of 2016, McInenly said.

“The goal isn’t to maximize the number of deer in front of a gun, but to determine how many deer should be on the landscape,’’ Cornicelli said. High deer populations impact forest regeneration, deer-vehicle collisions and agricultural damage, he said.

All of those factors, as well as hunter satisfaction, must be considered when determining optimum deer populations, he said.

There never will be enough deer to satisfy all hunters. Even during years of record harvest, hunter success rates rarely exceeded 40 percent, and usually are around 30 percent — meaning most deer hunters don’t get one.

Johnson says he understands that, but said many areas can support much higher deer densities, without causing other problems. His petition calls for changes to be made in time for the 2014 deer season, and he’s hoping he and his supporters can collect at least 100 signatures per county.

He dismisses other potential reasons for the low deer harvest in 2013, including high winds and standing corn when the season opened.

“It’s not wind, it’s not corn — there just aren’t as many deer in the woods,’’ Johnson said.

Doug Smith • Doug.Smith@startribune.com

Twitter: @dougsmithstrib

  • get related content delivered to your inbox

  • manage my email subscriptions

Click here to send us your hunting or fishing photos – and to see what others are showing off from around the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

Houston 23 FINAL
Pittsburgh 30
San Diego 10/23/14 7:25 PM
Denver
Detroit 10/26/14 8:30 AM
Atlanta
Buffalo 10/26/14 12:00 PM
NY Jets
St. Louis 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Kansas City
Houston 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Tennessee
Minnesota 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Tampa Bay
Seattle 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Carolina
Baltimore 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Cincinnati
Miami 10/26/14 12:00 PM
Jacksonville
Chicago 10/26/14 12:00 PM
New England
Philadelphia 10/26/14 3:05 PM
Arizona
Oakland 10/26/14 3:25 PM
Cleveland
Indianapolis 10/26/14 3:25 PM
Pittsburgh
Green Bay 10/26/14 7:30 PM
New Orleans
Chicago 98 FINAL
Cleveland 107
New Orleans 88 FINAL
Washington 84
Milwaukee 120 FINAL
New York 107
Philadelphia 88 FINAL
Brooklyn 99
Charlotte 114 FINAL
Atlanta 117
Sacramento 99 FINAL
San Antonio 106
Memphis 103 FINAL
Dallas 108
Tampa Bay 2 FINAL
Edmonton 3
Arkansas State 7:00 PM
Louisiana
Connecticut 10/23/14 6:00 PM
(18) East Carolina
Miami-Florida 10/23/14 7:00 PM
Virginia Tech
So Florida 10/24/14 6:00 PM
Cincinnati
Troy 10/24/14 6:30 PM
South Alabama
BYU 10/24/14 8:00 PM
Boise State
(6) Oregon 10/24/14 9:00 PM
California
North Texas 10/25/14 11:00 AM
Rice
UAB 10/25/14 11:00 AM
Arkansas
Rutgers 10/25/14 11:00 AM
(16) Nebraska
Maryland 10/25/14 11:00 AM
Wisconsin
Texas 10/25/14 11:00 AM
(11) Kansas State
Minnesota 10/25/14 11:00 AM
Illinois
Memphis 10/25/14 11:00 AM
SMU
North Carolina 10/25/14 11:30 AM
Virginia
San Jose St 10/25/14 12:00 PM
Navy
Northern Ill 10/25/14 12:00 PM
Eastern Mich
(25) UCLA 10/25/14 1:00 PM
Colorado
Akron 10/25/14 1:00 PM
Ball State
Massachusetts 10/25/14 1:00 PM
Toledo
Ohio U 10/25/14 1:00 PM
Western Mich
Ga Southern 10/25/14 1:00 PM
Georgia State
Kent State 10/25/14 1:30 PM
Miami-Ohio
Oregon State 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Stanford
Fla Atlantic 10/25/14 2:30 PM
(23) Marshall
Louisiana Tech 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Southern Miss
(1) Miss State 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Kentucky
Georgia Tech 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Pittsburgh
(22) West Virginia 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Oklahoma State
Texas Tech 10/25/14 2:30 PM
(10) TCU
Michigan 10/25/14 2:30 PM
(8) Michigan State
Boston College 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Wake Forest
Central Mich 10/25/14 2:30 PM
Buffalo
Vanderbilt 10/25/14 3:00 PM
Missouri
Old Dominion 10/25/14 3:00 PM
Western Ky
UNLV 10/25/14 3:00 PM
Utah State
Temple 10/25/14 4:00 PM
UCF
(15) Arizona 10/25/14 5:00 PM
Washington St
Texas-El Paso 10/25/14 6:00 PM
TX-San Antonio
Wyoming 10/25/14 6:00 PM
Colorado State
Syracuse 10/25/14 6:00 PM
(21) Clemson
Texas State 10/25/14 6:00 PM
ULM
(3) Ole Miss 10/25/14 6:15 PM
(24) LSU
(4) Alabama 10/25/14 6:30 PM
Tennessee
So Carolina 10/25/14 6:30 PM
(5) Auburn
(13) Ohio State 10/25/14 7:00 PM
Penn State
(20) USC 10/25/14 9:00 PM
(19) Utah
(14) Arizona State 10/25/14 9:45 PM
Washington
Nevada 10/25/14 10:59 PM
Hawaii
Montreal 10/24/14 5:30 PM
Ottawa
Saskatchewan 10/24/14 8:30 PM
Calgary
Hamilton 10/25/14 3:00 PM
Toronto
Brt Columbia 10/25/14 6:00 PM
Winnipeg
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

question of the day

Poll: Should the lake where the albino muskie was caught remain a mystery?

Weekly Question

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Close